The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1090 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2023
Paul O'Kane
Is there time for me to ask a further question?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2023
Paul O'Kane
I am confused. Last week, when Lady Dorrian was asked directly about what engagement there had been over the proposed amendments, she said that
“high-level suggestions have been made to us”
and she spoke about being “presented with a paper” that the senators felt that they
“could not respond to, because it was lacking in detail. Another paper was submitted to us that had more detail, but at a very high level”.
The senators had
“not looked at detailed proposals for amendment. Insofar as we were able to, we responded to that in as ... helpful a way as we could.”
Crucially, Lady Dorrian said that
“the devil is in the detail”,—[Official Report, Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee, 28 November 2023; c 13, 7.]
and explained that it is not possible to comment on detail that is not there. I am trying to understand why we are in this position.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2023
Paul O'Kane
I am trying to understand why we are in the position of having to amend the bill at stage 2. The committee does not have the detail on that and nor do the Lord President and the senators of the College of Justice. The minister would accept that it is highly unusual for the most senior judges in the country to come to a committee of the Scottish Parliament to give evidence. Will she outline clearly what consultation took place with the Lord President and what information he was given about the amendments?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2023
Paul O'Kane
I appreciate the degree to which we want to find consensus, and the Lord President and other stakeholders are obviously keen to make a contribution, but would the minister accept that it is for the committee to make a judgment on the amendments, that any changed nature of the bill will once again need to be scrutinised, and that that is a real challenge for the committee in carrying out its democratic function in the timescales that we have?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 30 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
I will continue from where Katy Clark left off.
The committee has heard significant criticisms of IIDB. For example, Ian Tasker told the committee that it is
“no longer fit for purpose”.
Given those criticisms, is it still an option to introduce EIA largely unreformed? Does the cabinet secretary recognise the criticisms of IIDB and does she view it as acceptable to introduce a benefit in that state?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 30 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
It is interesting that the cabinet secretary talks about timescales and the length of time that it will take to do things in this space. The Scottish Government has made repeated commitments to bring forward the consultation, but it has been continually delayed. The committee was told in September that the consultation would happen this year. The last month of the year starts tomorrow. Therefore, where is the Scottish Government in the process of formulating the consultation? Why have there been such repeated delays? What has prevented the Government from providing clear timelines on this?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 30 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
The cabinet secretary has made that point a number of times. The issue is that the pledge to carry out a consultation is now three years old. Can the cabinet secretary give the committee any sense of the timescale for the consultation? As I said, the last month of the year starts tomorrow. Clearly, you are not going to deliver a consultation this year, so is there any indication of when it is going to happen?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 30 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
The Scottish Fiscal Commission has forecast that spending on IIDB will be £84 million this year, falling to £81 million in 2027-28. Does the cabinet secretary recognise that the budget saving there is, in essence, because people are dying? People are not able to make a claim and they are dying. Does she recognise that that is a serious issue?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
I am grateful to your lordships.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2023
Paul O'Kane
The Government will lodge amendments, we think. In a sense, that is the known unknown. We have had that discussion with other witnesses.
Can the bill be amended? You said that a compromise will not satisfy everyone. Are there amendments that could be made that would move the bill to a place where we could get more consensus? There was a view that perhaps the Lord President did not feel as consulted in your review as he could have been. I am keen to get your view on that. Could the legal profession have contributed more to your review and got us to a position of consensus?