The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1090 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 12 September 2024
Paul O'Kane
Good morning. I will try to pull together some of our discussions by asking about parity of esteem and how the sector feels about the budget allocations and negotiations.
First, I am particularly interested in what mechanisms we could introduce to provide third sector organisations with more stability. We have touched on three-year funding and the benefit of knowing what is coming. In the context of the demand for your services and the services of other partners in the public sector, what sort of mechanisms, in line with fair funding principles, would you like to be introduced?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 12 September 2024
Paul O'Kane
In relation to funding, whether from the Scottish Government or the local authority, do you feel that the pressures as a result of need are being managed? You talked about waiting lists—I assume that those are for voluntary sector services that provide care, support and those sorts of things. Do you feel that that is factored into your budget conversations?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 12 September 2024
Paul O'Kane
I was trying to set the scene, because we are interested in how the sector feels about its relationships. Do you feel that you are an equal partner? There is partnership and there is true partnership—some partnerships are perhaps better than others. Is there still a sense in the sector that it is often looked at as the cheaper alternative to public services? We have certainly heard that people feel that way.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 12 September 2024
Paul O'Kane
Can I bring Ran Majumder in to give us the urban context? Shetland is a helpful example of where things are working well and where the challenges are. Ran, do you see some of the same things in the Edinburgh context?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 12 September 2024
Paul O'Kane
You have pre-empted my next question, which you might have heard me ask earlier, on parity of esteem and ensuring that this is not about the voluntary sector doing something more cheaply than the public sector. Euan Leitch talked about being asked to do more and more with less, and we have heard from SCVO and others—as well as from Rachel Cackett—that many organisations are at their lowest ebb. What else can be done to start to repair the relationship? Whatever happens, there has to be a kind of reset moment—although I feel that we have had lots of “reset” moments over the years. Is there one thing that could be done immediately that would start to really change the conversation and the approach?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 12 September 2024
Paul O'Kane
I think that Allan Faulds wants to comment.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 September 2024
Paul O'Kane
The challenge of being the last questioner is that we have covered a lot of ground. However, it is important to pull together some of what we have heard this morning.
In our conversation, we have focused on multiyear funding, as is right—it is at the core of the discussion. However, fair funding principles go beyond that, and a number of different things need to happen in order to move the issue forward. Witnesses might want to touch on anything that we have not covered on relationships or structures. We have heard about parity of esteem. What sorts of things need to be not just put forward but implemented and sustained in order to really help to renew that relationship?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 September 2024
Paul O'Kane
Some of the evidence that we heard when we met organisations over the summer was about the challenge between innovating and trying to sustain something that works. They said that, very often, people get stuck in a cycle between things having to be new and things that have been proved to work. You touched on that. Do you recognise it?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 September 2024
Paul O'Kane
Good morning. One aspect of the bill that the committee is interested in and concerned about is the domestic abuse provisions. We want to ensure that they are being engaged with. I note that, in the summer engagement, you met the Scottish Federation of Housing Associations and the Chartered Institute of Housing to discuss those provisions. Will you give an update on those conversations? Do you feel that the discussions were productive in enabling understanding of the required training and the capacity of social landlords to take the action that they will need to take?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 September 2024
Paul O'Kane
Thank you for that answer. I make a similar point to Mr Stewart’s point about not reinventing the wheel. A lot of good practice already exists, and many RSLs have good policy. However, the challenge is often to ensure that those policies can be put into practice and that action can follow, which is what everyone wants to see in such scenarios. The responses of Scottish Women’s Aid and the Scottish Women’s Convention pointed to the fact that the actions that were outlined and the recommendations that were contained in the report, “Improving housing outcomes for women and children experiencing domestic abuse” still have to be pushed forward and not lost in this context. Will the minister say something about progress on that and engagement with that piece of work?