The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1184 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee 3 December 2025 [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Katy Clark
Convener, would it be okay to ask a question about decontamination and the extent to which that is covered in the review?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft[
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Katy Clark
It is helpful that that has been put on the record.
On the provisions on the law of retention, I note that proposed new section 21A(4) states that the effects of retention
“must not be clearly disproportionate to the effects of the breach”
of contract. Can you clarify exactly what “clearly disproportionate” means? Why is that going to be included in the bill?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft[
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Katy Clark
Proposed new section 21D(b) gives courts the power
“to refuse the exercise of … retention where that … would be inequitable.”
Can you explain what is meant by that and what you envisage will be covered by that provision?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft[
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Katy Clark
Good morning. What is your understanding of the main benefits of the new rules on remedies for breach of contract in part 2?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft[
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Katy Clark
Obviously, if you want to write to us further on that, that will be very helpful.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft[
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Katy Clark
I was going to come on to that in my next question, but if you want to deal with those issues as a whole, that is fine.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft[
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Katy Clark
That would be fine. Your position, then, is that this is a codification of current law. There is no intention to change the law—this simply codifies what is already there.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Katy Clark
The only new designations that would automatically take place as a result of the bill would be those under section 3, on publicly owned companies. People can already make FOI requests about those companies, but any requests would have to be made to the public body that owned the company in question. We hope that there will be savings, because it will no longer be necessary to go to the parent body, which would otherwise have to retrieve the information from the publicly owned body and then provide it to the member of the public or whoever made the FOI request. In drafting the financial memorandum, we looked at those organisations. We costed in that there may be a cost for the publicly owned body, but we hope that that cost would be transferred from the organisation that owns it.
The evidence that the committee has heard and, indeed, the evidence that was put before me is that there is a very wide range of views and evidence on the cost of an FOI request. The amount that different organisations spend varies tremendously. Sometimes, the cost is said to be related to the efficiency of the organisation’s systems and the amount of resource that it decides to put into FOI compliance.
The policy intention behind the bill is to reduce cost, and we hope that that will happen through standardisation and the codes of practice. However, we recognise that when there is a designation of a new body—it could be a very large body—there will be costs for that body, and we have outlined those in the financial memorandum.
In general, those costs will not be borne directly by the Scottish Government; they will be borne by the new body. That body might be a multinational company, a third sector organisation or a charity. It could also be a private body—for example, it could be a privately owned care home, if the Parliament decided to go down that path. However, all those matters will be looked at by the Parliament when the Scottish ministers come forward with a recommendation for a designation or, indeed, if the Parliament decides to use the designation mechanism that is proposed in the bill.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Katy Clark
That is a bigger question. Why Governments do not always act as quickly as they could is not a party-political question. I suppose that they listen to stakeholders from all sides and always face pressures not to act as well as pressures to act. It is difficult to explain why decisions are taken not to act, but I presume that it is because matters are complex.
You have heard evidence about stock transfers. When council houses moved to housing associations and other bodies, there was a loss of rights and it took 13 years for those to be brought back. There has been a loss of rights in many sectors, such as when there was outsourcing in the justice sector—there is no sign of those services coming back to being run by the Scottish Government. Rights have been lost and political decisions have not been made to maintain those after services have been transferred.
As you have heard in evidence, ScotRail is now back in public ownership, because of which we have FOI rights again. Designation does not seem to have been significantly onerous for that body. The housing associations and other bodies that are now required to comply with the legislation receive only a relatively small number of requests.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Katy Clark
It would strengthen the commissioner’s position and help to drive the bill’s intention, which is to ensure transparency, accountability and openness. Part of the reason is to ensure better use of the public pound and better public policy.