The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1184 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Katy Clark
Emma Forbes, you referred to 46 prosecutions. Is that correct? Would you perhaps clarify exactly what that number refers to?
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Katy Clark
What was the nature of those charges?
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Katy Clark
I am grateful for that clarification. I was going to ask you about that legislation, because this bill provides for the repeal of the offences that are set out in that section of the 1982 act, which criminalises street prostitution.
You have given us an indication of the number of charges that have been brought. Can you say a little bit more about the use of that offence in recent years and whether you support its repeal?
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Katy Clark
Alasdair, you used the word “curiosity”. I am interested in understanding a little more about how the authority identifies issues of concern. We know that there has been a reduction in public confidence, which has been referred to; we have had very serious allegations about sexism and misogyny; the Sheku Bayoh inquiry has been going on for a lengthy period; there are clear allegations about racism in the police force; and we also have concerns about the policing of some protests, such as those by Palestine Action.
How do you and your organisation identify issues of concern? You have spoken about the matter in quite a managerial way, but I am trying to understand how you work to drive the changes that you identify as being required in the police, given some of the concerns that the public have raised.
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Katy Clark
I will pick up on some of the points that have just been made. Chief Constable Farrell, I hear clearly what you are saying, particularly in relation to the increased threats. However, over many decades, we have seen a shift in policing, and the constant complaint of people and communities that elected politicians hear—and have heard over many decades, because this is not new—is that, increasingly, when someone calls the police when there has been an incident, they do not come and that there are fewer police around.
There used to be police in communities, including in small towns—there was visible policing—and there has been a move away from that over a long time. That has been a deliberate policy; a decision has been made that that is not the best use of policing resources. I have had that justified to me by people from the police on many occasions over many years. They have told me that there is a need to centralise resource into some of the priorities that you have highlighted, such as counterterrorism work and work to tackle organised crime and cybercrime.
There is absolutely no doubt that there has been some success in that regard. You have also spoken about the number of organised crime offenders who are in prison, which is another example of some of that success. There have also been many successes related to the work at Gartcosh, for example. However, the cost for local people and communities is that, when they phone the police—in justifiable circumstances, about a crime—they are not getting the service that they believe that they are entitled to, that many other people believe they are entitled to and that, I have no doubt, you would wish people to be entitled to.
Part of the ask that you have come to the committee with today is for community police officers, so can you say more about what you mean by “community police officer”? If we were able to persuade the Scottish Government to agree to your request, would that mean more visible policing in communities and that, when there was an incident, it would be more likely that the police would be available to provide that service? Will you expand on that? If you want, you can also talk about some of the pressures that you face, but I ask you to comment on how we drive resources so that there is a better service in communities.
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Katy Clark
What is your organisation’s assessment of the scale of the challenge and how bad it is? It would be helpful for the committee to know that.
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Katy Clark
We are straying from the central issue about whether it should be a pardon or quashing, but I understand the point that you have made. Do any of the other witnesses want to make any points on quashing convictions or a pardon?
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Katy Clark
There are currently a range of offences that deal with issues such as human trafficking and the running of brothels, which the bill does not seek to change. Is there a need to strengthen or otherwise reform other offences that are relevant to prostitution?
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Katy Clark
That is helpful. Do any of the other witnesses have a view on whether the offences in the 1982 act should be repealed?
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Katy Clark
That is helpful.
The bill seeks to quash existing convictions. I know that Emma Forbes has concerns about that, and one alternative that has been suggested is that people who have been convicted should be pardoned. What are your views on the quashing of existing convictions and the alternative of a pardon?
I will go to Dr Forbes to start, given that she has already expressed a view.