The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 932 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Katy Clark
Thank you.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Katy Clark
There has been criticism in some of the responses to the call for views in relation to section 30(3), which requires landlords to serve irritancy notices to a tenant’s creditor. What are your thoughts on that?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Katy Clark
Finally, some have suggested that the transitional provisions are uncertain, or could lead to uncertainty. Do you think that the transitional provisions, as they stand, are likely to lead to uncertainty, or are problematic, or do you feel that, as the previous panel set out, they are perfectly reasonable? Do any of you have a view on that?
11:45Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Katy Clark
I have some questions on the points that have been raised.
Section 28 allows tenants to withhold payment if the landlord fails to notify them of the United Kingdom address to which termination documents may be sent. What is your position on the views on that that have been expressed in the responses to the call for views?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Katy Clark
Some of the responses to the call for views have suggested that the transitional rules are likely to be a source of uncertainty for parties to leases. Could you explain how the transitional provisions in the bill will work with regard to commercial leases that have already been entered into before the bill comes into force?
10:15Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Katy Clark
I will ask the same question that I put to the previous panel. What is your position on some of the criticisms of section 28 of the bill, which allows tenants to withhold payment if the landlord fails to notify them of their UK address? You probably heard the evidence that David Bartos, on the first panel, gave. Is it right that the landlord should have a UK address? If they have only a registered office or a plaque on the wall, is that pretty meaningless? Do we need to know where the landlord is located?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Katy Clark
Sure. Do other witnesses agree with that or have a view?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Katy Clark
Some responses made criticism of section 30(3), which requires landlords to serve irritancy notices to a tenant’s creditor. Do any of you have a view on that? Do you agree with the criticisms that have been made?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Katy Clark
Do any of the other witnesses have a view on that particular issue?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Katy Clark
As I indicated previously, all of my amendments in this group are probing amendments, which I do not plan to push to the vote today. They were lodged after discussions with Scottish Women’s Aid and are very much aimed at strengthening the requirement in new section 56A of the Housing (Scotland) Act 2001, as inserted by section 45 of the bill, for social housing providers to take account of a domestic abuse policy, to require a review of women’s aid provision and to enable the public debt of domestic abuse survivors—for example, rent arrears—to be written off. I will listen carefully to what the minister has to say today, with a view to considering whether to bring back versions of the amendments at the next stage.
Amendment 1061 requires relevant bodies to ask individuals whom they have reason to believe might be
“homeless or threatened with homelessness”
whether their situation arose as a consequence of either past or on-going experience of abuse.
Amendment 1062 defines abuse—the definition is outlined in the amendment—and amendment 1063 requires the relevant body, where it is informed that a person is threatened with homelessness
“as a consequence of ... having experienced or experiencing abuse”,
to provide details of support to that person.
Amendment 1064 is a wider amendment, in that it expands the range of individuals whom relevant bodies need to respond to, where they believe that they might be threatened with homelessness due to the threat or experience of abuse.
Amendment 1088 calls on Scottish ministers to carry out a review of temporary housing provided to people who have suffered domestic abuse. Such a review would take into account international standards, including treaties that the United Kingdom has perhaps not signed up to, but which are considered international norms—for example, provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence.
Amendment 1066 requires Scottish ministers to consult, while amendment 1089 relates to the issue of public debt and the scope of domestic abuse policies, with a particular focus on issues such as writing off the whole or part of rent arrears.
As I have said, I have spoken to these amendments before. I am very much interested in hearing the minister’s views today, but I do not plan to press amendment 1061 or move any others on this occasion.