The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1673 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 27 September 2023
Russell Findlay
Some of what you refer to is in part 6—for example, independent legal representation for victims when section 275 applications are made.
You talk about the need to define “trauma-informed practice”, but the legislation does not do that; it simply says that the Lord President will decide at a later date what those arrangements will be. Why can that not just be done by the Lord President or by the courts already, without legislation, since the legislation does not specify what it is?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 27 September 2023
Russell Findlay
To understand the issue, I will put it in simple layman’s terms. Are you saying that the Scottish Government’s motivation was not to improve or change conviction rates, but that the study suggested that that was a likely consequence?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 27 September 2023
Russell Findlay
I am still not entirely clear about whether the proposed changes are likely to change conviction rates.
Criminal Justice Committee, Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting)
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
Russell Findlay
Okay. There has been talk about stigma as well. The facility will be near a couple of businesses that have been identified in the media, and they may have difficulties with having the facility on their doorstep, given the associations with the crime that might take place and the behaviours that might occur. The Scottish social attitudes survey shows that a significant number of people in this country might support rehabilitation and treatment but they do not want such facilities on their doorstep. How do we persuade people that this is something that should be in their community or on their doorstep? I invite anyone to comment on that.
Criminal Justice Committee, Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting)
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
Russell Findlay
There is a lot of talk about decriminalisation being necessary or desirable but, in reality, if we look at the most recent statistics, we see that just over 30,000 people were found in possession of drugs in Scotland in 2019-20, of whom 158 were convicted of possession. Is it not the case that the police and the Crown are already operating de facto decriminalisation?
Criminal Justice Committee, Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting)
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
Russell Findlay
As far as we know, that has been decided—is that correct?
Criminal Justice Committee, Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting)
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
Russell Findlay
However, the numbers of people who are convicted for simple possession are minuscule.
Criminal Justice Committee, Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting)
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
Russell Findlay
We have struggled to get data on the use of recorded police warnings. Were you referring to the announcement that the Lord Advocate made in 2021?
Criminal Justice Committee, Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting)
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
Russell Findlay
I think that the Lord Advocate wanted to maintain the right to prosecute for the purpose of prosecuting those who are dealing drugs but who have possession amounts on them, which might be reflected in the figures. That aside, do you still think that it is wrong that there should be a right to prosecute? Maybe you will have to repeat yourself.
Criminal Justice Committee, Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting)
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
Russell Findlay
If we had better data and a better understanding of how recorded police warnings work, we could assess that a lot better.