The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1673 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2023
Russell Findlay
My question is specifically on the fact that the bill says that, once it is enacted, the judiciary will decide what trauma informed looks like. Should the bill not state what that looks like up front?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2023
Russell Findlay
You make 14 recommendations in the report. I do not know whether I understood your opening statement correctly, but I think that you said that the first recommendation might go slightly beyond your remit. Indeed, that recommendation calls for
“a strategic review of the whole systemâ€
from start to finish. The question is whether the Scottish Government has welcomed that suggestion—whether such a review looks likely—and whether the other 13 recommendations are, temporarily at least, redundant until recommendation 1 is either accepted or rejected.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2023
Russell Findlay
Okay. That was fantastic. Thank you very much.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2023
Russell Findlay
I have a continuation of the line of questioning from my colleague Sharon Dowey. Police Scotland and the Crown Office have both written to the Finance and Public Administration Committee with concerns about the bill’s financial memorandum, and the finance committee’s convener has written to this committee’s convener and to you about that.
Some of the biggest concerns relate to the cost of sex crime courts, which are mentioned in part 5 of the bill and are therefore a matter for another day. However, the cost of the commissioner is also cited as an area of concern. In that light, is the Scottish Government revisiting, reassessing or re-evaluating the cost of the bill?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2023
Russell Findlay
Is the cost being re-evaluated or reassessed?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2023
Russell Findlay
Okay. I have had dealings with the Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland in relation to the specific case of a baby who died. I did not realise that they were perhaps going beyond their remit. I know that you cannot speak to that, but surely there will, due to the very nature of the criminal justice system, be cases that require the commissioner to engage and perhaps take action and make some form of immediate intervention.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2023
Russell Findlay
In general terms, is the financial memorandum that accompanies a bill always a work in progress, with the capacity to change as the bill evolves?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2023
Russell Findlay
With the full weight of the Government behind it, we could get it done.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2023
Russell Findlay
Thank you. That is the nicest thing you have ever said to me. [Laughter.]
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2023
Russell Findlay
That brings us back to one of the questions that someone else asked about the Parole Board not being part of the bill’s remit, which you have already answered.