The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1673 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Russell Findlay
On page 15 of paper 2, there are statistics from Police Scotland about the number of domestic crimes that were reported to it. It would be helpful to know, of all those reported, how many were subsequently reported to the Crown Office and what happened next. Of those reported, how many were diverted from prosecution and how many were prosecuted and, of those prosecuted, what was the conviction rate? It is all very well saying that the act has been successful if you are judging that on the number of cases that have been reported but, if we do not know what happened consequently, we do not know whether that success is disappearing into a black hole. That would be useful data to acquire, if we can.
On page 18, a contribution from the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service seems to be making a virtue of the Aberdeen pilot for the domestic abuse court. From my memory of the evidence that the committee heard, it was quite difficult for us to acquire information and, when we eventually did, my memory is that only a dozen or so cases had ever gone ahead. Therefore, rather than the success that it is being presented as, it seems to have been underused, and the numbers were so low as to make it difficult to draw very much by way of a conclusion from the pilot.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Russell Findlay
Yes. I think that the trials were virtual in their entirety; that was the purpose of the pilot. However, from what we could establish, due to reluctance on the part of the accused and their lawyers, that often did not happen, which might have explained—call me cynical—why it took us so long to establish that the court had been used so infrequently. Therefore, for it then to pop up in a letter as evidence of good work and progress is questionable.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Russell Findlay
You mentioned the single sheriff model for civil and criminal cases, which I have raised a few times. I found some of the reasons against that to be slightly questionable, if not spurious, although some of them were valid. Watch this space, because I think that that is being looked at.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2023
Russell Findlay
Thank you. An extension of that is the view of the Crown Office and Police Scotland that the commissioner should not be allowed to become involved in individual cases. They claim that its doing so would potentially prejudice legal proceedings. Do you believe that it is reasonable and straightforward to empower the commissioner to act in certain cases without interfering with justice?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2023
Russell Findlay
So, Parliament would need to address any potential non-compliance—that would not be part of the bill, because that would be inconsistent with other commissioners.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2023
Russell Findlay
In its written evidence to the committee, NHS Education for Scotland says that the bill’s definition of trauma-informed practice should align with its five-point definition, which was published this year. However, the bill does not include two of those five points. NHS Education for Scotland says that it is “essential” that they be included and that leaving them out
“may also hinder the effective implementation of other elements of the Bill.”
It wants the Scottish Government to reconsider the issue. Will you?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2023
Russell Findlay
Does it not cause you some concern that a senior Police Scotland officer has told the committee that the problems will not be fixed by the bill?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2023
Russell Findlay
I was talking about Mr Frew’s comments.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2023
Russell Findlay
As a member of the Parliament, I am trying to understand the process, because you might lodge an amendment with good intent but, if the necessary work has not been done to assess the costs, it can potentially create more problems.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2023
Russell Findlay
I do not doubt it. Thank you.