The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1673 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Russell Findlay
Will the faculty boycott it?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Russell Findlay
Do you mean that there would be a disciplinary consequence, potentially?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Russell Findlay
Thank you. Last week, we heard from rape victims who waived their anonymity and who had mostly had a pretty terrible experience of the courts and the wider justice system. I asked them if they backed the proposed juryless rape trials, and their answers were quite surprising. One of them, Anisha Yaseen, said:
“I do not think that the proposal is a good idea. That would definitely have put me off. Had that been a thing before I reported what happened, I do not think I would have reported it.”
Sarah Ashby said:
“Having a single judge is not, in my opinion, the way to go.”
A third response, from Hannah Stakes, was a bit more nuanced. She said:
“There is something to be done on that, but I am concerned that, if a case was heard by a single judge and they were biased, there might be more reason to worry about a mistrial.”—[Official Report, Criminal Justice Committee, 17 January 2024; c 30.]
Their position is at odds with that of Rape Crisis Scotland. Sometimes, we fall into the trap of believing that all victims speak as one and that all experiences are universal. Are you surprised by the strong views that were expressed last week by those victims? Have you had any indication from behind-the-scenes discussions and lobbying about whether there is any movement from the Scottish Government on that particular issue?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Russell Findlay
Good afternoon. The Scottish Solicitors Bar Association told us that its members will boycott any juryless rape trials, which it says would increase the risk of
“a miscarriage of justice, deliver no discernible benefits ... and undermine the public’s confidence in our criminal justice system.”
Incidentally, it is worth putting on record that members did not make any decision not to have witnesses from the SSBA here, and I am confident that we will continue to welcome its engagement.
I put the risk of a boycott to Lady Dorrian, who responded by saying that that was more an issue for us to deal with and not so much for her. However, I expect that it will very much become an issue for the senior judiciary, if they end up sitting in a court with no jurors and no defence lawyers. My questions are quite practical. Is a boycott the set position of the profession? Is that position universally held? What engagement has there been with the justice secretary or the Scottish Government more generally on that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Russell Findlay
I am sorry to interrupt. According to the SSBA, its members have pretty much universally said no. However, as your membership incorporates all of its members, there may be solicitors who may indeed take part.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Russell Findlay
In addition, it was only in autumn last year that the new rules were brought in under which judges instruct jurors about rape myths, so we do not yet know what effect that has had.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Russell Findlay
Your research also analysed and assessed every rape case in England and Wales between 2007 and 2021, which was thousands of cases. No such research has taken place in Scotland.
You have proposed two possible reasons for the apparent difference in outcomes in the two different jurisdictions, one being that Scottish jurors may be more biased, the other being that it is due to differences in the legal systems. However, because of the lack of similar research in Scotland, we cannot properly get to the bottom of that.
My question is for all the witnesses. Does the lack of research into the Scottish system make it difficult for the committee to assess whether the measures in the bill are required? Anyone can answer that.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Russell Findlay
I have a quick question about research. Professor Thomas has helpfully torpedoed another myth, which is that you cannot speak to real jurors. Are there any moves for that to happen in Scotland?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Russell Findlay
You have helpfully answered one of my other questions, so I will come in with one more quick question.
In England and Wales, judges have been able to direct juries about rape myths since 2006; that is effectively compulsory. However, it is only since autumn 2023 that that has begun to happen as a matter of routine in Scottish courts. The legal fraternity says that the practice needs to be allowed to bed in and that an assessment of its impact needs to take place—I think that you essentially agree with that.
Can you give us your thoughts on that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Russell Findlay
Yes. Thank you.