The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1673 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
I would like to return to the point that was raised by Rona Mackay on the HM Inspectorate of Prosecution in Scotland report from 2021, which talked about CAAPD freezing cases, and you have already referred to that. The detail of that report is actually quite shocking. It said that cases were frozen while you were gathering or requesting additional work to be done. In some cases, I think that it reset the clock rather than just paused it.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
That answer illustrates neatly how complicated the landscape is for a member of the public. If that were represented as a flow chart, it would be quite confusing.
Communication with complainers—whether they are police officers or members of the public—is vital. To go back to the HMIPS report, it said that communication from CAAPD was unsatisfactory in four in 10 of the 80 cases that were looked at. The report contains quite detailed accounts, some of which are pretty shocking, to be frank.
You came into your post when that report was produced. What can you say about the quality of communication from CAAPD now?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Russell Findlay
I do not want to put words in your mouth, but, as the PIRC, are you now confident that, if similar cases arose now or in the future, Police Scotland would treat them properly?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2024
Russell Findlay
I have heard of examples of domestic abuse victims suffering from their encounter with the police. Is that the type of thing that you are talking about?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2024
Russell Findlay
It is a very broad range, yes. Thank you, I will not take up any more time.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2024
Russell Findlay
I am more interested in the specifics of the enforcement and monitoring. Is that perhaps quite an unusual way of ensuring that the code is monitored? Could the legislation that we are looking at not be amended to do it?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2024
Russell Findlay
Does that sometimes put the federation in a bit of a bind? If it is a blue-on-blue complaint, when an officer may be a whistleblower of some sort, the complaint will often be about other officers. Do you find that a bit of a conflict to deal with?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2024
Russell Findlay
Sticking with costs and specific to your evidence, Mr Malcolm, you said that the proposal for civilian employees to come under the duty of ethics and fundamentally change their employment status would interfere with their existing employment rights. They would become a regulated workforce in the same way as police officers. Your written submission made a useful comparison, saying that you would not treat non-medical National Health Service staff as you would treat doctors and nurses. The last line caught my eye. It says:
“Should any change of status be imposed, remedying such disparities would be a matter of urgency for Unison.”
Reading between the lines, that sounds expensive. It sounds as though Unison would bang down the door of the SPA saying, “Each and every one of our members who is subject to these new regulations deserves a pay rise.” Is that what that means?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2024
Russell Findlay
Was there a conversation about that between Unison and the Government prior to publication of the bill?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2024
Russell Findlay
One issue that is a bit of an elephant in the room is the potential cost of the legislation. The initial financial memorandum put the figure at £1.4 million or thereabouts. The latest figure from the Scottish Government is approximately £5.8 million, which is more than 300 per cent higher. Yesterday, the convener of the Finance and Public Administration Committee, who is a Scottish National Party MSP, said that the Scottish Government knowingly presented to the finance committee
“figures that it knew were completely inaccurate”—[Official Report, Finance and Public Administration Committee, 7 May 2024; c 52.]
The SNP justice secretary denied the charge but, clearly, it is of significant concern. Do any of you have any insight into whether that £5.8 million is realistic, whether it is likely to go higher and what it might mean for policing generally?