The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1673 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 23 May 2024
Russell Findlay
Section 10 of the bill allows police officers acting as members of the public to go to the PIRC, which is, again, something that you support.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 23 May 2024
Russell Findlay
Is there any likely movement on the bill in that respect?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 23 May 2024
Russell Findlay
I should perhaps know this, or perhaps it was not asked of the police witnesses yesterday, but do the police support that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 23 May 2024
Russell Findlay
One of the reasons I ask is that one of the unions that represents non-police-officer staff says that the duty would potentially come with pay demands. Would that be a factor in reconsidering it?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 23 May 2024
Russell Findlay
That makes sense.
The committee has taken evidence on the suicide of police officers, which is a very sensitive subject. The criminal allegations against the police division was able to tell us, when it gave evidence, that five officers took their own lives, four of whom were subject to non-criminal misconduct proceedings; one of them was accused of a criminal matter. The family and friends of some of those who have died have expressed concerns about not only the impact of the proceedings on those people as a potential contributory factor in what happened to them, but the subsequent lack of scrutiny of the circumstances of those cases.
They are absolutely tragic and suicide is complex, but are you satisfied that the bill will, in some way, address that apparent blind spot?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 23 May 2024
Russell Findlay
Another issue that the bill seeks to address is protection for police whistleblowers. We have heard about horrific cases, and there have been cases reported in the public domain, of the service losing good officers and good officers losing their careers. That is a huge financial cost to the service, and it impacts on people’s health and wellbeing.
Again, taking the bill in the round, is there enough in there that would protect those officers whose only wrongdoing appears to have been trying to make a valid complaint and blow the whistle from having their lives destroyed as a result? Does the bill partly fix that, or is it more about culture?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 23 May 2024
Russell Findlay
But we are talking about police officers who have cause to blow the whistle in relation to what is going on in the organisation.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 23 May 2024
Russell Findlay
You spoke to Pauline McNeill about section 15 giving the PIRC the power to review Police Scotland and the SPA’s work. You are opposed to that, but the PIRC is supportive of it. In its submission to us, it said:
“there have been occasions where at the conclusion of investigations, matters have been highlighted to HMICS for review, however, due to capacity, HMICS has not been in a position to undertake same.â€
I do not think that that is a criticism; it is more the case that the PIRC believes that including it by giving it the proposed power will add capacity. Is that a compelling argument?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 23 May 2024
Russell Findlay
I wonder whether there is a belt-and-braces argument for it, as there is with your proposal about whistleblowers being able to go to the PIRC and the SPA. It would provide that option.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 23 May 2024
Russell Findlay
The PIRC has said that it does not have the resources or the personnel for other proposals in the bill, so that is consistent with what you have said.