The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1673 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 April 2022
Russell Findlay
There have been some historical issues with the judicial complaints process, which resulted in the first judicial complaints reviewer, who said that the role was pretty toothless, standing down. It is worth seeing whether anything has changed.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 April 2022
Russell Findlay
The progress box on “Codes of Practice” is green—it is marked as “Completed”. I do not want to ruin anyone’s happiness, but there has been no response from the Lord President or from the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service about complaints and how people might get redress—not in relation to judicial decisions, but in relation to conduct issues. I do not know whether they just did not choose to respond or whether there is any desire to go back to them to follow up on that.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 April 2022
Russell Findlay
It is worth noting that, in relation to victims, there was no response from the Crown Office, the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service or the Parole Board for Scotland on—
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 March 2022
Russell Findlay
It is not just those two criteria that would apply in control zones, because private home owners could bring in a fireworks company, too. People who live in those areas might think that they will have some peace and quiet, but nothing will have changed, because fireworks could still go off there. That might confuse people.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 March 2022
Russell Findlay
Ignore the first part if you want. I am really asking about the unintended consequences of putting legitimate and responsible traders out of business while fuelling a black market in fireworks.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 March 2022
Russell Findlay
I have a question on licensing, but I will first make a couple of observations on the data. We have learned today what the Crown Office has done with the numbers from the past 10 years or so, but we still do not know how many actual incidents have been reported to the police or recorded by the police. Perhaps we can get that information.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 March 2022
Russell Findlay
Last week, Fraser Stevenson of the BFA told us that, in 2020, his organisation had sent the minister a 10-point plan, point 4 of which concerned raising the age at which someone can buy fireworks from 18 to 21. Given that we have heard today that the average age of those who are prosecuted is 22, that seems like quite a sensible proposal from the industry and is perhaps a more sensible and effective starting point than the legislation, which seems to be quite convoluted and confusing. Why was that suggestion not taken on?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 March 2022
Russell Findlay
The bill establishes penalties of up to six months’ imprisonment for some offences, yet the Scottish Government has extended the presumption against short sentences to sentences of up to 12 months. I wonder whether there is a possible inconsistency in that respect. I am trying to understand how that particular proposed sentence was arrived at.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 March 2022
Russell Findlay
We have heard that there is a lack of evidence on the number of cases that are currently prosecuted. We have struggled to get that information, and the British Fireworks Association witness expressed similar frustrations in trying to ascertain how much lawbreaking and associated prosecution there already is. How can we establish that? If, as the suspicion might be, the law is, indeed, not being used to its fullest extent just now, why add to that if there is a risk that the new legislation would not be fully enforced either?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 March 2022
Russell Findlay
Secondly, on your observation that we might be able to ban fireworks if Scotland was independent, I do not know if that is what you are seriously proposing.
Going back to the licensing question, we heard evidence from a responsible fireworks shop owner, Norman Donald. He said that the licensing rules under the bill would most likely put him and others out of business. We have also heard evidence about the fabled white-van man of Blackburn, who roams around selling fireworks to children. The suggestion is that the unintended consequence of the bill would be to put legitimate operators out of business, while it is an absolute gift to the white-van men. Is that really something that you want to happen?