The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1673 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Russell Findlay
That is great. Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Russell Findlay
No problem.
This question is for the cabinet secretary. We have heard your concerns in writing and verbally. Pauline McNeill asked a version of this question. Do you agree with the sentiment behind what is intended by the bill, which is to find truth and justice for many of the people who suffered loss during the troubles? Do you back that principle, even if the bill is not the way to achieve it?
Criminal Justice Committee, Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, Social Justice and Social Security Committee: Joint Committee
Meeting date: 24 November 2022
Russell Findlay
On the subject of transparency, the Auditor General’s March report said that there is a lack of transparency about where spending is taking place. When I met him last month he told me that things are still much the same. Why is there no transparency about the £250 million?
Criminal Justice Committee, Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, Social Justice and Social Security Committee: Joint Committee
Meeting date: 24 November 2022
Russell Findlay
I have got a lot to ask about but so, too, does everyone else, so I will stick to what I think is the most important issue.
Yesterday, Faces and Voices of Recovery UK published a new report, which, as I am sure that the minister is aware, is quite critical of the Scottish Government. It talks about a phenomenon that it identifies as “pretend rehab services” in which services that are being categorised for the purpose of rehab are really for stabilisation. As helpful and important as stabilisation is, do you accept that criticism, and how do you respond to it?
Criminal Justice Committee, Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, Social Justice and Social Security Committee: Joint Committee
Meeting date: 24 November 2022
Russell Findlay
It is worth noting that the FAVOR report did not use the word “pretendy” but the word “pretend”.
On the subject of counting rehab beds, I have seen an email that a senior policy officer in the Scottish Government’s residential rehab team sent this month. That official said that there was an error in a Scottish Government report about rehab beds.
It became clear after the report’s publication that wrong information had been published about more than 40 rehab beds. Those were in fact stabilisation beds, not rehab beds. That meant that the document wrongly said that there were 218 rehab beds when there were in fact 170. How can something like that happen in an official Government report? Does that speak to FAVOR’s concerns about a blurring of the lines—as evidenced by that mistake—between rehab beds and stabilisation beds?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Russell Findlay
My question was about body-worn cameras.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Russell Findlay
Good afternoon to you all. From what we have heard today, it sounds as though the Scottish Government has not asked some pretty big questions, has sometimes asked the wrong questions and has provided answers that can best be described as questionable to other questions.
I find it perplexing that justice social work was not properly consulted on this. Given the fundamental and pretty serious concerns that you have all articulated in response to Jamie Greene’s questions, we are pretty clear about what you want to happen.
I just want to take a step back. Do we know why the Scottish Government chose not to listen to those who know best? Do you have confidence, given what you have said today, that it will do so now?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Russell Findlay
Do you think that people would be surprised that £51 million has been paid out through incompetence or wrongdoing but no one has been held to account?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Russell Findlay
Will you answer the question, please?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Russell Findlay
Eleven fire stations do not have a water supply; more than 100 have no rest or canteen facilities; more than 150 do not have sufficient showering facilities; 100 do not have the minimum toilet provision; 125 do not have dedicated locker rooms; more than 100 do not have dedicated drying facilities; 282 do not have dignified changing areas; and no fire station has a first aid room or space for nursing mothers. That has nothing to do with inflation, Brexit or the UK Government.
10:45According to the evidence that the interim chief officer gave to the committee, more than “£482 million” has been removed
“from the cost base of the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service over the past 10 years.”—[Official Report, Criminal Justice Committee, 26 October 2022; c 46.]
That is due entirely to the amount of money that is provided to the fire service by the Scottish Government. Will you address those concerns and the concerns of firefighters about those extremely poor facilities?