The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1673 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee, Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting)
Meeting date: 22 March 2023
Russell Findlay
The pilot scheme for heroin-assisted treatment has cost in the region of £4 million, which I understand includes start-up costs. Those who favour the rehabilitation route accept that it is not an either/or between rehabilitation and harm reduction, but they point out that it costs in the region of 17 times more to treat someone with that particular programme than it costs for typical public sector rehabilitation. How do you respond to their concerns?
Criminal Justice Committee, Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting)
Meeting date: 22 March 2023
Russell Findlay
Just so that I understand, do you mean that the quarterly spending on every project is now published, or is that the plan?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Russell Findlay
Of course.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Russell Findlay
I have one more question, which is for Professor Burman. In the written evidence, you talk about civil and criminal cases sometimes running in tandem, albeit they are completely disconnected. I am familiar with cases in which an abuser has used the criminal courts as a means to extend and prolong abuse, or they have used the civil court to delay or derail the criminal prosecution. Has any research been done into that specific problem? Has anyone given any consideration to a fairly radical fix of combining criminal and civil matters relating to the same parties, or is that getting a bit ahead of the game?
11:00Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Russell Findlay
I do not know, but that might be one of the cases that is referred to in the Police Scotland submission.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Russell Findlay
I have a quick supplementary question for Mr Naylor. Does HMICS have any remit around training and targets? Can you hold the police to account in certain ways?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Russell Findlay
Has that appeal been through the court?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Russell Findlay
The written submission from Police Scotland was really detailed and helpful. On page 9, it refers to two cases, which Moira Price has already referred to. Those are cases where DASA was successfully used to prosecute rapes under a DASA charge, which otherwise would have been uncorroborated and not prosecuted. Those cases are both the subject of appeals, and I will not ask you to predict the outcomes, but I would like to ask you a two-part question.
First, do those appeals have any bearing on current DASA cases, or are any cases incorporating a rape charge or rape element on pause because of the appeals? Secondly, in the worst-case scenario, if the cases are successfully appealed, does that fundamentally derail DASA for that purpose?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Russell Findlay
My next question is simply on something that I am curious about. The policy note says that section 31 of the 2003 act
“will allow persons in the UK to give evidence via telephone to a court in any of these countries.â€
Would that sort of thing still be done by telephone?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Russell Findlay
It would potentially be of value to consider that.