The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1769 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Do you think that the bill as drafted allows for that or are there mechanisms that need to be changed in order to drive the culture change?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Do you think that the bill, in its current form, will drive the bottom-up approach that is needed or is it still a top-down approach that is being taken?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 September 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Are you prepared to consider the issue of facility time, too?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 September 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
My understanding is slightly different. I understand that they were poles apart to an extent, but that that was largely down to the fact that there would be a hole in the funding that employers would need to find in order to come to an agreement.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 September 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Good morning, minister. Thank you for answering the questions that you have answered so far.
I understand to a degree the point that you make about the budget, but I will take Willie Rennie’s question further and suggest that there is a responsibility on Government to consider how it will solve the problem. Countless organisations, including the Fraser of Allander Institute and Audit Scotland, have said that, if the Government is serious about even one part of its agenda that it says that it is serious about—the green economy—it cannot achieve its aims for that by making cuts to further and higher education. Therefore, the situation needs cross-portfolio working. What conversations are you having across Government about that? Is there any connection at all to the national strategy for economic transformation?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 September 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 September 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Up until last week, you held the line that you and the Government should not be intervening. Then there was a meeting, and you intervened, and you found £4.5 million to help to facilitate the deal. I know that colleges, staff, students and I—and others around the table, I am sure—were pleased to see that happen. What changed?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 September 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Are you in a position to explain where the £4.5 million will come from?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 September 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Minister, part of the issue is that we are in a situation where there are in-year budget moves, and that is because of that kind of decision making.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 September 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I have a question about the letter that the Cabinet Secretary for Finance and Local Government wrote yesterday to the Finance and Public Administration Committee, about some of the cuts that may have to come. On mental health services, an £18.8 million reduction is earmarked. The letter says that that
“Saving includes mainstreaming elements of the Distress Brief Interventions programme”
and
“student mental health measures”.
Will you elaborate a bit more on what that means and how much of a cut it might mean for institutions and for students’ mental health?