The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1769 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
With respect, cabinet secretary, I think that you are really missing the point—
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
What do we need to change to improve the conditions for staff in that respect, so that they can deliver the change that is needed?
09:30Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
My earlier point was not that we should now have an independent review, although that is a legitimate view. It was more about whether, when you saw all of this happening before the SQA did the review, you asked it to do an independent review.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I want to build on the point about statutory codes of practice and move slightly to the point that Laura Caven made about other services. We have heard about the role of schools. COSLA’s additional support for learning project board, which I think, Laura, you are a co-chair of, has highlighted the importance of refreshing the code of practice on learning for pupils with additional support needs, but action on that appears to be way down the line.
One area in the plan that has been identified as having zero actions completed is resources. Laura, could you talk a bit about whether you feel that there is enough pace of work in the additional support for learning project board to help to make the connections across the different agencies that you highlighted, and whether you think that the code of practice will be updated any time soon?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
If not strategies or legislation, what will change the dynamic?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Do the other witnesses want to add anything?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
All of them are working for the SQA as part of that process. They might work in schools, but they are also part of the SQA process. Was anyone who was not part of the process—
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
It is a question to be asked.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I understand that. At any point in the review, should you have spoken to people who have not been part of the marking process that you oversee? You said that the review was undertaken internally by the SQA. Would it not have been helpful to speak with people who were not already part of the SQA?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
On that point about the meeting, I have heard that there were two meetings about the matter. At the first meeting, it was decided that there would not be a lowering of the grade to take into consideration the difference, but, four days later, it was decided that there would be. What changed in the process in those four days?