The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1769 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
My final question is for you, Ms Scarlett. In 2019, the Government consulted on student support for disabled students. There was a recommendation for a forum to consider what needs to change and to drive forward the change that is needed. Has that forum been set up? If so, how is it doing? If not, should it be set up?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
You are saying that the problem is about having 18 or 19 different data-sharing arrangements. It is really helpful to know that.
I have spoken with some of the organisations involved in the pilot, such as RGU and North East Scotland College, which are doing excellent work. They mentioned the idea of a unique student number, which is why I spoke about that as a mechanism that could make data sharing a little easier.
My next question is on student experience. Most of us round this table recognise that we must support people to get the best out of whichever institution they are at, whether that is school, college or university, or whether they are in employment. Since the widening access agenda took off, that issue has become more prevalent. Please set out some of the things that universities are doing to support their students. In doing so, I ask that you talk about that work in the context of your funding arrangement, which has not necessarily improved during the same period.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I have a final question to ask, if that is okay.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I have two quick questions. First, you mentioned the ÂŁ15 million that was announced yesterday and you said that your understanding is that it will be for the University of Dundee. Is it your expectation that the Scottish Funding Council will use it for that purpose?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Can you point to something in the bill that will change that from the start?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I appreciate that, and it brings me to my final question. What will change if the bill is passed? You have spoken about the qualifications committee and a schools unit, but what will be different after the bill is passed and why should we, as parliamentarians, and the public have confidence that things will change?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I want to ask specifically about the cabinet secretary’s direction. I understand a lot of the obligations that you have set out, and I am sure that there are many. Did you get any direction from the cabinet secretary in relation to the SATH survey?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
A number of the questions that I was going to ask were around culture, and they have already been covered.
I will take us back to 2020, when SATH said that similar circumstances had occurred. I understand that SATH has suggested that there were two exchanges—one email and one phone call—that made it clear that the SQA was displeased with the survey and that it could potentially lead to the SQA failing to support SATH in the future. That was in 2020, when a similar survey, I assume, resulted in similar circumstances. How did we end up here again, if a similar incident had already happened? What is different this time that will convince subject organisations that engagement with the body will be respectful and collaborative?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I will pick up on the original response from Shirley Rogers about the people on the panel not necessarily being there in 2020. I accept that, I do, but it happened in 2020—I say “it”—and it seems that something similar is happening again. Short of saying, “Trust me,” which, as you said, will not do it, what will mean that we will not be back here in another couple of years?
In addition, what engagement have you had with the cabinet secretary and what has she asked of you in this regard?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I am content to consider them together, but I have a question about one of them. Is it okay to put that question now?