The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2015 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I have one final question. Did you take in-year spending decisions without the UEG?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Were you ever told that a vice principal who you suggested should be there should not be there?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
The globalisation strategy was the change in approach. Why was Wendy Alexander not invited back to court after 23 September, given all that you have put on the record about what happened in the university, such as international student numbers and the globalisation strategy being serious concerns? Why would you not want that information?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
However, you have also said that a large part of what happened in Dundee was down to the changes in the international student market. Your suggested change in approach was the globalisation strategy as opposed to more recruitment—
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
But you did not think to invite her to court at any point. You did not feel that you should bring that expertise into the decisions that the university was making in order to address some of the concerns about the situation that it was in.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Are you suggesting that the evidence that she has given is untrue? She shared emails.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Good morning, panellists, and thank you for joining us.
I have a couple of follow-ups for Amanda Millar. You said earlier that the court and the executive were different. What was the rationale to exclude some of the executive? What changed in 2023, when you decided to have different people?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
You also said that there was perhaps missing information. Could that not be because some of the people who had that information were excluded from court?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
A number of people—this comes out in the Gillies report—have said that they felt that it was quite difficult to raise concerns and that views were suppressed at times. Is that perhaps why they felt that it was difficult to give the information to court? The chair of court should surely want to create a culture in which people can ask questions and be inquisitive about decisions. However, it does not appear that that was the case—so much so that, when they did not ask questions, you decided that they should not come to court.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I am afraid that some of that does not quite add up. Dr McGeorge and Peter Fotheringham, you have both said that you used the information available to you to draw the conclusions that you did and to make the decisions that you made about recruitment, that you were told nothing else about the circumstances and that things might have been different had you been given different information. Is it fair of me to say that?