³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 2 August 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2015 contributions

|

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

University of Dundee

Meeting date: 26 June 2025

Pam Duncan-Glancy

I have one final question. Did you take in-year spending decisions without the UEG?

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

University of Dundee

Meeting date: 26 June 2025

Pam Duncan-Glancy

Were you ever told that a vice principal who you suggested should be there should not be there?

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

University of Dundee

Meeting date: 26 June 2025

Pam Duncan-Glancy

The globalisation strategy was the change in approach. Why was Wendy Alexander not invited back to court after 23 September, given all that you have put on the record about what happened in the university, such as international student numbers and the globalisation strategy being serious concerns? Why would you not want that information?

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

University of Dundee

Meeting date: 26 June 2025

Pam Duncan-Glancy

However, you have also said that a large part of what happened in Dundee was down to the changes in the international student market. Your suggested change in approach was the globalisation strategy as opposed to more recruitment—

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

University of Dundee

Meeting date: 26 June 2025

Pam Duncan-Glancy

But you did not think to invite her to court at any point. You did not feel that you should bring that expertise into the decisions that the university was making in order to address some of the concerns about the situation that it was in.

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

University of Dundee

Meeting date: 26 June 2025

Pam Duncan-Glancy

Are you suggesting that the evidence that she has given is untrue? She shared emails.

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

University of Dundee

Meeting date: 25 June 2025

Pam Duncan-Glancy

Good morning, panellists, and thank you for joining us.

I have a couple of follow-ups for Amanda Millar. You said earlier that the court and the executive were different. What was the rationale to exclude some of the executive? What changed in 2023, when you decided to have different people?

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

University of Dundee

Meeting date: 25 June 2025

Pam Duncan-Glancy

You also said that there was perhaps missing information. Could that not be because some of the people who had that information were excluded from court?

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

University of Dundee

Meeting date: 25 June 2025

Pam Duncan-Glancy

A number of people—this comes out in the Gillies report—have said that they felt that it was quite difficult to raise concerns and that views were suppressed at times. Is that perhaps why they felt that it was difficult to give the information to court? The chair of court should surely want to create a culture in which people can ask questions and be inquisitive about decisions. However, it does not appear that that was the case—so much so that, when they did not ask questions, you decided that they should not come to court.

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

University of Dundee

Meeting date: 25 June 2025

Pam Duncan-Glancy

I am afraid that some of that does not quite add up. Dr McGeorge and Peter Fotheringham, you have both said that you used the information available to you to draw the conclusions that you did and to make the decisions that you made about recruitment, that you were told nothing else about the circumstances and that things might have been different had you been given different information. Is it fair of me to say that?