The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2015 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Good morning. Thank you for your answers to the questions so far, Professor Sullivan, and I thank both panellists for the evidence that they have given ahead of today.
My first question is for Professor Sullivan and it is on data. What have you learned from your research colleagues in parts of the world where self-identification has been in place for some years? What impact have they found that there has been on data collection?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
My next question is for both witnesses. Professor Sullivan already touched on this when she mentioned section 22 of the 2004 act. What are your views on how the proposed changes would affect single-sex spaces?
Some people have said that our laws are different and not comparable with those in other parts of the world, because of section 22, on protected information. What is your understanding of the impact of the proposed changes on section 22, and how other countries have handled similar situations?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Are you able to comment on section 22 of the 2004 act in particular?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
That is fine.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Can I just check: did you say that someone would not contravene section 22 by collecting data on sex?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you. Would any proposals in the current draft bill amend section 22 in any way, or would it remain as you have just described?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Good afternoon to the panel. Thank you for the evidence that you have given so far and the information that you submitted in advance, which we found incredibly helpful.
A lot of my questions have already been covered, with the exception of a couple, so I will focus on them. You have touched on this, but can you tell us, from experience elsewhere, whether there are any countries that have monitored the impact of self-identification on the use of single-sex spaces?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Will the ability to withhold the fact that someone has a gender recognition certificate, as it is protected information, be affected by the bill?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Yes.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you both for your answers.
I want to move on to talk about what we have heard already, which is the interdependence of human rights. I wonder if the SHRC could comment. We have heard from some people who have given evidence to the committee that there are women who are self-excluding from services and public spaces, such as toilets and changing rooms. That self-exclusion itself is significant enough to be proportionate and meet the test that you have set to determine that changes may be needed.
Can you tell us about your understanding of that behaviour and how it relates to this particular piece of legislation? I very strongly take the point that we must refer specifically to the legislation that is in front of us, as opposed to anything else.