łÉČËżěĘÖ

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 13 August 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1174 contributions

|

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Minister for Parliamentary Business

Meeting date: 21 June 2022

Paul Sweeney

I am sure that we are up for getting stuck into it. I have a supplementary question about that. So that we can keep an eye on progress, would it be possible to have a table of the outstanding bills and reports and the Government’s position on each one so that we have some indication of when bills might reach the Parliament? That would give us oversight. A lot of public money has gone into developing reports, so it seems to be inefficient to have them sitting gathering dust. It might be good to have that oversight so that we could see, for example, that something has taken two years and we could ask what is happening and could revisit it from time to time.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Minister for Parliamentary Business

Meeting date: 21 June 2022

Paul Sweeney

I will turn to historical commitments that have been pursued by predecessor committees. Our predecessor committee welcomed the Scottish Government’s work in meeting almost all of its historical commitments by the end of the previous parliamentary session. The longest-standing commitment is now on the Education (Listed Bodies) (Scotland) Order 2018?(SSI 2018/7). What is the Government doing to ensure that it meets that and other outstanding commitments?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Minister for Parliamentary Business

Meeting date: 21 June 2022

Paul Sweeney

Forgive me if I am wrong.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Minister for Parliamentary Business

Meeting date: 21 June 2022

Paul Sweeney

Thank you.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Minister for Parliamentary Business

Meeting date: 21 June 2022

Paul Sweeney

Thank you.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Participatory and Deliberative Democracy

Meeting date: 15 June 2022

Paul Sweeney

I want to ask more about the Government’s specific governance arrangements for the exercise, to ensure that you achieve the satisfactory outcomes that you envisage.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 15 June 2022

Paul Sweeney

I think that Mr Ewing covered the matter fairly comprehensively. I am intrigued to hear the minister’s response.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 15 June 2022

Paul Sweeney

I note an interesting interaction between this session and the previous evidence session with Mr Adam, the minister dealing with the Government’s participatory and deliberative democracy agenda. There is a big concern about the attachment of community benefits to big planning projects, whether they relate to energy or something else, and it is an issue that needs to be addressed much more rigorously in NPF4. For example, I know from planning decisions made in Glasgow that there is real concern about funding disappearing centrally in council budget lines and not being attached to material and tangible improvements in the community that is the locus of the development.

There are clear issues that need to be tightened up and considered. There is also a potential interface with the agenda in Mr Adam’s portfolio.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 15 June 2022

Paul Sweeney

I concur with what Mr Ewing said with regard to a need for remedy, which is clear in terms of natural justice.

I think that there is another stakeholder, because Glasgow City Council is the successor body to Glasgow Corporation. Any question of liability would probably need to be discussed, which therefore requires a response from Glasgow City Council as well as from the Scottish Government. We should therefore also make inquiries of Glasgow City Council.

The instincts in bureaucracy are to defend against liability and against extending liability, but that is the wrong approach in this instance. We should therefore try to establish a remedy for a group that has clearly suffered harm.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 15 June 2022

Paul Sweeney

A common theme that came across from all the petitions is governance and the need for checks and balances in relation to the structures of health boards. The rights of rural communities would be better enshrined in a formalised setting by creating some sort of statutory body that advocates for them and places obligations on health boards. We need to set a safety standard that identifies very clearly that driving such distances to access critical care is inherently unsafe.

That would place an obligation on the health board to address that as a standard issue. Perhaps some reflection is needed on how that might look. The petition does not make that demand, but an issue emerged in conversation during the evidence session about whether some sort of body could say, “This is a defective system for these reasons. You need to address it.” Such a body might be equivalent to the Scottish Housing Regulator, for example, and it could place such obligations on health boards. It seems that the idea that that could be done through the health board was challenged—there was a feeling that boards might be prone to groupthink and that what is needed could not necessarily be achieved just by having a rural representative on a health board, because their voice would be drowned out.