The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1174 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Paul Sweeney
I am sure that we are up for getting stuck into it. I have a supplementary question about that. So that we can keep an eye on progress, would it be possible to have a table of the outstanding bills and reports and the Government’s position on each one so that we have some indication of when bills might reach the Parliament? That would give us oversight. A lot of public money has gone into developing reports, so it seems to be inefficient to have them sitting gathering dust. It might be good to have that oversight so that we could see, for example, that something has taken two years and we could ask what is happening and could revisit it from time to time.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Paul Sweeney
I will turn to historical commitments that have been pursued by predecessor committees. Our predecessor committee welcomed the Scottish Government’s work in meeting almost all of its historical commitments by the end of the previous parliamentary session. The longest-standing commitment is now on the Education (Listed Bodies) (Scotland) Order 2018?(SSI 2018/7). What is the Government doing to ensure that it meets that and other outstanding commitments?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Paul Sweeney
Forgive me if I am wrong.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Paul Sweeney
Thank you.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2022
Paul Sweeney
Thank you.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2022
Paul Sweeney
I want to ask more about the Government’s specific governance arrangements for the exercise, to ensure that you achieve the satisfactory outcomes that you envisage.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2022
Paul Sweeney
I think that Mr Ewing covered the matter fairly comprehensively. I am intrigued to hear the minister’s response.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2022
Paul Sweeney
I note an interesting interaction between this session and the previous evidence session with Mr Adam, the minister dealing with the Government’s participatory and deliberative democracy agenda. There is a big concern about the attachment of community benefits to big planning projects, whether they relate to energy or something else, and it is an issue that needs to be addressed much more rigorously in NPF4. For example, I know from planning decisions made in Glasgow that there is real concern about funding disappearing centrally in council budget lines and not being attached to material and tangible improvements in the community that is the locus of the development.
There are clear issues that need to be tightened up and considered. There is also a potential interface with the agenda in Mr Adam’s portfolio.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2022
Paul Sweeney
I concur with what Mr Ewing said with regard to a need for remedy, which is clear in terms of natural justice.
I think that there is another stakeholder, because Glasgow City Council is the successor body to Glasgow Corporation. Any question of liability would probably need to be discussed, which therefore requires a response from Glasgow City Council as well as from the Scottish Government. We should therefore also make inquiries of Glasgow City Council.
The instincts in bureaucracy are to defend against liability and against extending liability, but that is the wrong approach in this instance. We should therefore try to establish a remedy for a group that has clearly suffered harm.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2022
Paul Sweeney
A common theme that came across from all the petitions is governance and the need for checks and balances in relation to the structures of health boards. The rights of rural communities would be better enshrined in a formalised setting by creating some sort of statutory body that advocates for them and places obligations on health boards. We need to set a safety standard that identifies very clearly that driving such distances to access critical care is inherently unsafe.
That would place an obligation on the health board to address that as a standard issue. Perhaps some reflection is needed on how that might look. The petition does not make that demand, but an issue emerged in conversation during the evidence session about whether some sort of body could say, “This is a defective system for these reasons. You need to address it.” Such a body might be equivalent to the Scottish Housing Regulator, for example, and it could place such obligations on health boards. It seems that the idea that that could be done through the health board was challenged—there was a feeling that boards might be prone to groupthink and that what is needed could not necessarily be achieved just by having a rural representative on a health board, because their voice would be drowned out.