The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1119 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Paul Sweeney
It looks like there are no final comments on the need for amendment to improve the definitions.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Paul Sweeney
Please do, Tressa.
12:00Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Paul Sweeney
That is great.
Lyn Pornaro, do you have any comments?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Paul Sweeney
I echo the sentiments expressed by colleagues. The session last week was very effective. I certainly learned a lot from it, and I am sure that colleagues did, too. A perspective that I had not previously considered was the impact on young people of having a supportive structure around them, then, when they transition to adulthood, perhaps having that support removed. That might influence people’s outlook on life.
Similarly, there are issues around self-administration for people with significant disabilities. A number of interactions really helped me to understand the practical application of the bill as currently drafted. I appreciate that.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Paul Sweeney
I thank the members of the panel for their contributions so far.
I turn to section 15 of the bill, on provision of assistance. Assistance is defined as
“providing the substance to end the person’s life, staying with the adult until they have decided they wish to use the substance or, removing the substance if they decide they do not wish to use it.”
The bill does not explicitly provide that the substance would have to be self-administered, but self-administration is stressed in the policy memorandum and explanatory notes.
As part of its written submission, MND Scotland has referred to its concern about whether the bill is sufficiently clear in relation to whether people with physical disabilities—with, for example, a progressive condition such as MND—who would find self-administration difficult or impossible, would have access to assistance. I wonder whether Susan Webster would start us off with concerns about the definition of “assistance”.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Paul Sweeney
I really appreciate your initial thoughts on that.
Section 15(1) of the bill simply mentions someone providing
“a terminally ill adult with an approved substance with which the adult may end their own life.”
The UK bill contains more detail on what is permitted in the definition of self-administration, in that it states that
“the coordinating doctor may—
(a) prepare that substance for self-administration by that person,
(b) prepare a medical device which will enable that person to
self-administer the substance, and
(c) assist that person to ingest or otherwise self-administer the substance.”
Would you like to see the bill being amended to have that level of detail or something similar? Is that, in essence, what you are asking for?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Paul Sweeney
I thank the members of the panel for their contributions so far today. A key part of monitoring the appropriate implementation of assisted dying would come in the shape of the bill’s reporting provisions. Are the reporting and monitoring requirements that are set out in the bill suitably robust to pick up on any potential misapplication of the law? Do you have any views on the current provisions?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Paul Sweeney
Okay—we can certainly note the point about an independent review. The obligation is on the Scottish Government to review the legislation and report to the Parliament, so we can perhaps take a view on who would be best placed to conduct an independent review. I thank you for that feedback—it is helpful.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Paul Sweeney
Thank you—that is helpful.
I note that the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill in England stipulates that a review should include an assessment of palliative care services, which seems to be roughly what you were suggesting, Ms Scobie. We can certainly look at that.
I know that there is a requirement in the bill for reporting within five years, but would you favour a sunset clause and/or a statutory review period that is shorter than five years following the legislation’s entry into force? Is five years too far out for you? What is your view on the timescale?
If you do not want to comment, or if there are no strong views about the five-year period, that is fine.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Paul Sweeney
Yes.