The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1165 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Paul Sweeney
On the GDP deflator, what assessment has the Government made of the impact of the rate on the delivery of personal care? Can you guarantee that people will still be able to access the care that they need and that it will remain free at the point of use?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Paul Sweeney
Thank you, convener. I want greater clarity on each panellist鈥檚 view of the benefits of a public health supplement over a social responsibility levy. Ms Douglas, you said that the public health supplement might be your preference. Are there any other particular views on that distinction?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Paul Sweeney
That is fine.
Is there any indication that minimum unit pricing has contributed to a levelling of the playing field for the on-trade and the off-trade? In particular, has there been any benefit to the on-trade?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Paul Sweeney
You mentioned the public health supplement, which was introduced and then discontinued. Do you support its reintroduction?
11:00Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Paul Sweeney
That is great. You talked about local communities having a degree of democratic oversight of the proceeds of that supplement. Would that money flow to a health and social care partnership, or would it reside with a different organisation?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Paul Sweeney
Does the minister accept that over 80 per cent of local government finance is determined by central Government grants and that that constrains local government鈥檚 capacity to meet the other side of the equation?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Paul Sweeney
Do any of the witnesses have concerns that there might have been unforeseen negative impacts on health-related outcomes that have not been picked up by the Public Health Scotland evaluation? Are there any other aspects that you would have liked to have been measured or that you have found it difficult or impractical to evaluate? For example, I have concerns about potential substitution with benzodiazepines鈥攕o-called street Valium.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Paul Sweeney
Are there any other strong or particular views?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Paul Sweeney
Have you any modelling evidence of what scale the public health supplement could be set at relative to MUP and the overall split price share?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Paul Sweeney
Clearly, the impact on retail revenue is difficult to ascertain given the lack of data that has just been described by panel members. We have also just heard from the representative of the Association of Cider Makers. I am keen to understand more about the secondary impacts on manufacturing. Is there any evidence from brewers and distillers that the feared consequences for their industries following the introduction of MUP have come about, such as reduced revenues for manufacturers or the discontinuation of certain products? Can the panellists point to any specific instances of effects on firms or products?