The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1174 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Paul Sweeney
The Law Society’s written evidence mentions an
“already crowded legislative and organisational landscape”
in this space. Can you develop that point around the current structures for how strategic planning and ethical commissioning are supported? Do you have an understanding of how the bill as currently drafted would move that on and create the circumstances for better organisational improvement?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2024
Paul Sweeney
I apologise—I thought that that was where we were at.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2024
Paul Sweeney
I thank the witnesses for their contributions so far. I am keen to understand more about the work that we can continue to do in the meantime. While we are considering the legislation, what can we do to expedite continuing progress on, for example, Anne’s law and looking at how we can pull that forward?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2024
Paul Sweeney
I want to cover the proposed amendments from the Scottish Government, whereby the original principle referring to fair work is replaced and a reference to ethical commissioning removed from the bill. Do you have a view on whether those adjustments would strengthen or weaken the bill, and on the suggested link between fair work and ethical commissioning in the sector?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2024
Paul Sweeney
I thank the witnesses for their responses. I want to build on some of the points that have been made in relation to Anne’s law, as well as to discuss the broader point around prevention, of which a key aspect is housing. Are there any aspects of the Housing (Scotland) Bill that could interface effectively with the National Care Service (Scotland) Bill? Would you like there to be better consideration of adaptations to housing, for example, to allow people to live in their homes for longer without having to be admitted to acute hospitals or care homes?
One aspect that I have encountered is the financial consideration of someone having to sell their home to fund residential care, which is effectively a one-way decision—there is no going back once the decision is made. Has that ended in disastrous results for some of your clients?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2024
Paul Sweeney
I apologise. I do not have any questions at this point.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2024
Paul Sweeney
That pretty much covers it. Do the witnesses have a view about amendments that you would prefer in light of the Scottish Government’s changes? You might not have the detail in front of you, but if you have proposals on how such amendments might look or what you would like, that would be helpful for the committee to consider.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2024
Paul Sweeney
That would be helpful. Thank you.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2024
Paul Sweeney
I want to pick up on a point that was raised last week in the pre-budget scrutiny session. Michael Kellet from Public Health Scotland suggested that the planned refresh of the national performance framework offers opportunities to further prioritise preventative spend. He talked about the split between revenue and capital spend in the 1990s, when there was a change in national budgeting. Does the panel agree with that approach in principle, and how do you think it could potentially work in practice if we further developed ring fencing, if you like, of preventative spend as well as of capital and revenue?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2024
Paul Sweeney
I want to pick up on the point about root cause being linked to prevention. In our pre-budget scrutiny session last week, Michael Kellet from Public Health Scotland said that the planned refresh of the national performance framework offered opportunities to further prioritise preventative spend. The example or analogy that he gave was the separation of revenue and capital expenditure in the fiscal frameworks, which was introduced in 1998, and he suggested that something similar could be done in order to secure and protect preventative expenditure in order to deal with root-cause problems. Is that something that you would agree with, and is there a practical way to achieve that?