³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 17 June 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1153 contributions

|

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Made Affirmative Procedure Inquiry

Meeting date: 7 December 2021

Paul Sweeney

That is an interesting insight—the perils of elective dictatorship. It is an interesting point to hold in perspective in relation to the Scottish Parliament, because the parliamentary arithmetic here is somewhat different and there is scope for us to scrutinise and to hold the Executive’s feet to the fire on inadequate provision in bills and ensure that they are not just skeletons, as you put it. That is worth considering.

It was helpful to have that stated explicitly for the purposes of what we are trying to achieve, so thank you for those non-technical takes. Is there anything further that you want to add that we have not considered about the made affirmative procedure and its scrutiny process? Both witnesses should feel free to jump in.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Made Affirmative Procedure Inquiry

Meeting date: 7 December 2021

Paul Sweeney

Can you hear me all right now, convener?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Made Affirmative Procedure Inquiry

Meeting date: 7 December 2021

Paul Sweeney

[Inaudible.]—to understand some of the—

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 1 December 2021

Paul Sweeney

I am sympathetic to the petitioner’s requests, which are clearly personally significant. I note the legislative change with regard to organ donation, which has created an opt-out system, and I do not see why the same principle cannot apply to all forms of post mortems or physical interventions on the body. There could be a system of proactive consent, whereby the next of kin could express their desire that such things did not take place. That is what happens with organ donation, which people now have to opt out of, and we could have a look at how those two issues interact.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 1 December 2021

Paul Sweeney

I agree with that. I do not know whether it is easy to define in law at what point estrangement takes place. I do not know whether that is clearly defined in legislation, so that might be the complexity that arises from the petition.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 1 December 2021

Paul Sweeney

Notwithstanding the Scottish Government’s submission, I think that it would be appropriate to take further evidence directly from stakeholders in the sector, particularly taxi drivers. I understand from my casework that there are significant problems of lack of sufficient support and that that has led to the exit of a significant number of drivers from the sector, which, in turn, is having a substantial impact on the availability of taxis in Scotland’s major cities and towns. On that basis, it would be worth conducting further investigation and seeking further submissions from relevant taxi owner associations and the relevant trade union branches.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 1 December 2021

Paul Sweeney

I do not find the Scottish Government’s response remotely convincing. There are extensive means by which ministers in Scotland can exert influence on the bus sector to change its practices, given the significant level of public funding that the sector enjoys, which is vital to its operation.

Furthermore, it seems like a bit of a cop-out for the Government to say, on the one hand, that the regulations are reserved and, on the other, that the operating administration is dealt with by local councils. That is not convincing. The Government is basically trying to bat away the issue. More can be done, and more scrutiny is required.

My Glasgow region colleague Pam Duncan-Glancy has given testimony that she has had significant issues with access to buses in Glasgow. In particular, First Bus Glasgow has a policy that only one wheelchair user is permitted per bus. Her husband is also a wheelchair user, so they are regularly split up and have to take two different buses to get somewhere by public transport. That seems appalling, given that there is adequate space on buses for both wheelchairs. Apparently, the company does that in order to preserve space for a potential pram user.

Those things are problematic and need further investigation, so I am minded to invite our colleague to address the committee on this and potentially consider additional submissions.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 1 December 2021

Paul Sweeney

The petitioner’s submission is harrowing and it would be good to invite her to give evidence orally to the committee if possible. That would be an appropriate first step.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Instrument subject to Affirmative Procedure

Meeting date: 30 November 2021

Paul Sweeney

The established protocols to have proof of double vaccination are to be combined with an option to show proof of a negative test. That has been demonstrated to be a reasonable procedure in practice, as most countries across Europe are operating similar protocols. However, I understand that there is potential for deception in the process. It is perhaps for the lead committee to consider how the aims of the legislation can be better achieved through the procedure. There might be opportunities to improve it, such as by introducing liability for those who are found, in the course of random inspection, to have cheated the system. That might introduce a greater incentive to comply with the requirement for honesty from the community as a whole in order to protect one another.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 17 November 2021

Paul Sweeney

It might be worth seeking submissions from relevant charities that operate in drug treatment, such as Transform. I am sure that the clerks could come up with a potential list of charities from which it might be worth inviting responses.