成人快手

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 19 June 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1160 contributions

|

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 9 March 2022

Paul Sweeney

That is fantastic. Did they agree that bringing reusable water bottles into schools was a good idea?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 9 March 2022

Paul Sweeney

Really? That is fantastic. It sounds as though there is a lot of support for your petition and that a lot of important voices have backed you up, which is really promising. Now that you have had the experience of going to COP26, it looks as though you have a good basis for doing the project to roll out reusable water bottles. What would you like to happen next?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 9 March 2022

Paul Sweeney

We will certainly look into that. We will see how much money we have left in our wallet. Thank you very much, Callum.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 9 March 2022

Paul Sweeney

What was the landowner鈥檚 motivation for felling the trees?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 9 March 2022

Paul Sweeney

So how we treat our built heritage is a valid comparator.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 9 March 2022

Paul Sweeney

Is there any provision in law to deal with conifer contamination? Is it not treated in the same way as other contaminations?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Coronavirus (Recovery and Reform) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 March 2022

Paul Sweeney

We are keen for the bill to be as shovel ready as possible, given any eventuality. The committee really wanted to make it clear that it should be a statutory requirement for a Scottish minister to provide a written statement prior to any instrument coming into force. However, the five powers as drafted in the bill do not clearly provide for such a statement. Might the Deputy First Minister consider including a clear, incontrovertible and explicit requirement to provide such a statement? We would really appreciate that adjustment.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Coronavirus (Recovery and Reform) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 March 2022

Paul Sweeney

It is important to establish that the desire is to develop the capability in the Parliament, because a gap has鈥攔ightly鈥攂een identified and I think that the Government agrees with that. Necessity is the mother of invention, so let us try to use this as a lessons-learned exercise. There is a bit less urgency for driving the bill forward, so in that sense we can take the time to get it right. If there is a degree of flexibility鈥攊t seems that a firm timetable has not been established鈥攑erhaps we can work collaboratively with the interest groups in the Parliament and the Government to come to an agreement. If that could be agreed in principle today, that would be a good thing.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Coronavirus (Recovery and Reform) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 March 2022

Paul Sweeney

We have established some options in principle. It might be worth taking that away as an action to look at liaising with the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee, and we could maintain correspondence about what might be an appropriate measure. In effect, we have agreed on the desirability of the outcome, so it is a question of what is the most practical mechanism for delivering it鈥攚hether that is a protocol or something that is more formalised. I guess that this committee will need to reflect on that and take a view, but it might be worth continuing the discussion later.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Coronavirus (Recovery and Reform) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 March 2022

Paul Sweeney

That is positive鈥攖hank you. I noted what was in the letter that you sent to the committee yesterday, especially in respect of the expedited affirmative procedure that we discussed. I welcome the Government鈥檚 indication that it will explore the idea of developing that protocol. Can we tie that to the Coronavirus (Recovery and Reform) (Scotland) Bill in a way that would help to inject some pace into the protocol鈥檚 development? It is fine to say in a hypothetical sense that we could develop it in due course, but perhaps it would be worth while to establish the protocol during the bill process, so that it can be tested.

There are examples of the made affirmative procedure being used in the past couple of years, and we could ask what we would have done if we had used an expedited procedure. How would we model it? Between the committee and the Government鈥攁long with the Parliamentary Bureau, if necessary鈥攚e could establish what that could look like, so that a more balanced approach would be taken in such a future scenario. We could then reach an equilibrium and codify it to some extent in the bill process. That could be a way of anchoring the idea in some way so that it is firmer.