The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 713 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Emma Roddick
I suppose that, if the Government is the catalyst for much of the churn, there should be more of an interest in the impact that that has on committee effectiveness.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Emma Roddick
What about the Dog Theft (Scotland) Bill?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Emma Roddick
If no one else has comments on that, I will ask a final question about the structure that allows members to sit on multiple committees.
The potential for extra meetings or extra committees to be set up keeps coming up in our discussion. That becomes more difficult if a member鈥檚 parliamentary week is already block booked with multiple committee meetings. What could be changed in the overall structure of how the Parliament sets up committees to allow that flexibility not just from a policy perspective but in respect of committee membership?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Emma Roddick
It is interesting that the idea of having a dedicated committee for post-legislative scrutiny keeps coming up. Some of the witnesses in our committee effectiveness inquiry who may be more familiar with how Westminster works have mentioned bill committees and the advantages of keeping those workstreams separate. That arrangement would require us to have smaller committees.
Karen, I am interested in your perspective from the equalities committee. That committee was expected to have a very busy legislative programme, but that is not the case now. How has that allowed you to explore other methods of scrutiny and to bring in issues that were not going to get an airing if the committee had had to deal with bill after bill?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Emma Roddick
I will follow up on that point briefly before I start my question. Does the Government want committees to be more effective?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Emma Roddick
Do you recognise that the legislation that has come forward in the current session has not been spread evenly among the committees? I appreciate that the Government does not set down the issues that sit in each committee鈥檚 remit. Do you see an advantage in the option of having bill committees, which would take the work of scrutinising bills from other committees?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Emma Roddick
Do you have numbers for how much subordinate legislation has been handed to committees in the different sessions?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Emma Roddick
It is being dealt with by the Rural Affairs and Islands Committee.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Emma Roddick
Is the concern that there would be too many bill committees? Would that be circumvented by setting up bill committees only for particularly large bills or when we expect there to be hundreds of amendments?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Emma Roddick
That is okay.
I know that quite a few different committees are looking at bills that perhaps do not naturally sit within their remit, as a result of certain committees being overloaded legislatively. Do members have any comments on the idea of having bill committees?