³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 18 June 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 713 contributions

|

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]

Housing (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Emma Roddick

My amendments seek to rebalance the skewed nature of where power lies in the tenant and landlord relationship. Amendment 138 seeks to extend the time that a tenant who is living in a designated rent control area has to refer a rent increase to a rent officer from 21 to 42 days, because 21 days is not long enough. The Government has already rightly recognised that there is work to be done on increasing tenants’ awareness of their rights in the private rented sector. When the time required to read and understand the notice, seek assistance and get advice is factored in, 21 days is a very short period.

Amendments 139 and 140 set meaningful penalties for landlords in a rent control area who ignore the requirements and limits that are set out for that area. Amendment 139 sets the compensation payment that a landlord must pay to a tenant at three times the amount by which the proposed increase exceeds the permitted increase, and amendment 140 obliges the rent officer to order that to be paid. To me, that is a just penalty, as the amount will be linked directly to how much more than the legal limit the landlord has attempted to charge their tenant.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]

Housing (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Emma Roddick

My amendment 444A is a simple amendment to Graham Simpson’s amendment 444, which I was glad to see. Should his amendment pass, a compensatory payment will need to be made available, so my amendment requires that future regulations that the Government brings in should provide a process for the making of such compensatory payments.

I agree with Graham Simpson’s comments. If tenants are left with serious repair issues that have not been seen to, they often suffer from extra hidden costs as well as having to continue to pay their rent despite the substandard state of the property that they are renting. That does not just create understandable resentment on the part of the tenant; it can be a factor in their feeling that they have to move somewhere else. Even if that place is not more expensive, moving costs are significant. In the worst cases, living with the repairs that need to be made can damage health, wellbeing and future work capacity, and pose a risk to life.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Committee Effectiveness Inquiry

Meeting date: 15 May 2025

Emma Roddick

Should churn ideally be avoided?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Committee Effectiveness Inquiry

Meeting date: 15 May 2025

Emma Roddick

There is, at the moment, significant churn in committee memberships. What do you think drives that?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Committee Effectiveness Inquiry

Meeting date: 15 May 2025

Emma Roddick

But some of it probably should be dealt with by the Criminal Justice committee.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Committee Effectiveness Inquiry

Meeting date: 15 May 2025

Emma Roddick

Ash, it sounds as though your perspective on proportionality in committees has been influenced by the short-term committee that you are sitting on, which is not proportional and has more parties represented. Do you have any more to say on that? Do others feel that there is an advantage in ditching proportionality and focusing on breadth?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Committee Effectiveness Inquiry

Meeting date: 15 May 2025

Emma Roddick

A few of you have already mentioned the benefits of having smaller committees. Does anybody have any comments on their potential limitations?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Committee Effectiveness Inquiry

Meeting date: 15 May 2025

Emma Roddick

Before others come in on that, can you expand on co-option and how that would work?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Committee Effectiveness Inquiry

Meeting date: 15 May 2025

Emma Roddick

One thing that has come up, in the previous panel and in our evidence sessions before that, is that there is a need for smaller committees, in order to allow members to delve more into questioning witnesses. How might having smaller committees impact Government planning either from a proportionality perspective or in how you interact with committees?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Committee Effectiveness Inquiry

Meeting date: 15 May 2025

Emma Roddick

From a Government perspective, are there difficulties when a committee is dealing with a bill that is outwith its own remit?