The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 713 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Emma Roddick
My amendments seek to rebalance the skewed nature of where power lies in the tenant and landlord relationship. Amendment 138 seeks to extend the time that a tenant who is living in a designated rent control area has to refer a rent increase to a rent officer from 21 to 42 days, because 21 days is not long enough. The Government has already rightly recognised that there is work to be done on increasing tenants’ awareness of their rights in the private rented sector. When the time required to read and understand the notice, seek assistance and get advice is factored in, 21 days is a very short period.
Amendments 139 and 140 set meaningful penalties for landlords in a rent control area who ignore the requirements and limits that are set out for that area. Amendment 139 sets the compensation payment that a landlord must pay to a tenant at three times the amount by which the proposed increase exceeds the permitted increase, and amendment 140 obliges the rent officer to order that to be paid. To me, that is a just penalty, as the amount will be linked directly to how much more than the legal limit the landlord has attempted to charge their tenant.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Emma Roddick
My amendment 444A is a simple amendment to Graham Simpson’s amendment 444, which I was glad to see. Should his amendment pass, a compensatory payment will need to be made available, so my amendment requires that future regulations that the Government brings in should provide a process for the making of such compensatory payments.
I agree with Graham Simpson’s comments. If tenants are left with serious repair issues that have not been seen to, they often suffer from extra hidden costs as well as having to continue to pay their rent despite the substandard state of the property that they are renting. That does not just create understandable resentment on the part of the tenant; it can be a factor in their feeling that they have to move somewhere else. Even if that place is not more expensive, moving costs are significant. In the worst cases, living with the repairs that need to be made can damage health, wellbeing and future work capacity, and pose a risk to life.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Emma Roddick
Should churn ideally be avoided?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Emma Roddick
There is, at the moment, significant churn in committee memberships. What do you think drives that?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Emma Roddick
But some of it probably should be dealt with by the Criminal Justice committee.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Emma Roddick
Ash, it sounds as though your perspective on proportionality in committees has been influenced by the short-term committee that you are sitting on, which is not proportional and has more parties represented. Do you have any more to say on that? Do others feel that there is an advantage in ditching proportionality and focusing on breadth?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Emma Roddick
A few of you have already mentioned the benefits of having smaller committees. Does anybody have any comments on their potential limitations?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Emma Roddick
Before others come in on that, can you expand on co-option and how that would work?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Emma Roddick
One thing that has come up, in the previous panel and in our evidence sessions before that, is that there is a need for smaller committees, in order to allow members to delve more into questioning witnesses. How might having smaller committees impact Government planning either from a proportionality perspective or in how you interact with committees?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Emma Roddick
From a Government perspective, are there difficulties when a committee is dealing with a bill that is outwith its own remit?