The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 713 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Emma Roddick
I found your written evidence interesting, because you suggest holding a full election in a region to replace a recalled regional member. My reflection on that was that it was a case of looking at the first-past-the-post element and trying to transpose it on to the regional element.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Emma Roddick
Yes. That was my point about proportionality. Even if a recalled regional member fails the yes/no vote, their party—if there is still a representative left on the list—retains the seat through proportionality.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Emma Roddick
However, we are looking to create parity between the two systems, and the constituency elections decide who wins seats on the list to the same degree as the regional elections do. Therefore, should we be looking to retain proportionality across the board?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Emma Roddick
I suppose that people are not used to having a role in that process as it stands. If there was a yes/no vote, it might not be appreciated that they would not be saying no to that party.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Emma Roddick
An idea that has been raised with the committee is the potential for the initial signing of a recall petition being a yes/no question, which could perhaps be a single-stage process for a regional member. You could then prove not only that the 10 per cent threshold had been reached but that a majority of those who voted wanted that person to be voted out. In that case, you might not have to go back to the electorate.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Emma Roddick
That is interesting. My next question, which is for Annabel Mullin, is about the idea of having a regional election to replace somebody who has been removed following a recall. When parties implement equalities mechanisms for their candidates, it is most often done through the regional list. Do you have concerns that getting rid of that part would result in a less representative Parliament?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Emma Roddick
I can hear you. I am not sure whether you can hear me.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Emma Roddick
Yes, I can hear you fine.
Maurice, you suggest that the creation of a stand-alone offence would result in
“improved data and ... an improved evidence base.â€
We have had evidence from Police Scotland and the Crown Office arguing that the offence would either make no difference to data collection or that it could make it more difficult. Have you considered other ways to improve data collection besides legislation? What is your response to the evidence that we have had?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Emma Roddick
That is great.
What are your views on the possibility of expanding the use of aggravators to include the theft of other working dogs? That point was raised in a few of our evidence sessions.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Emma Roddick
Yes, absolutely. Graham Simpson has guessed what my next comments will be. Overall, work needs to be done. I am happy to have those conversations with the cabinet secretary alongside Graham Simpson and other members. I agree that we should be working together. It seems that there is rare and strong consensus on the issue.
Mark Griffin, too, was right. I have the casework that he describes. Apart from the fact that the cause is often nothing to do with what the tenant is up to, there is no explaining to tenants who cannot afford to pay their heating bills that the landlord expects them to keep their windows open more of the time.
The issues that were raised by Ariane Burgess’s and Daniel Johnson’s amendments also deserve attention. Tenants should have a right to withhold rent in cases in which serious repairs are not being seen to, and landlords do not have a justification for raising their rent while that is the state of the property.