³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 18 June 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 713 contributions

|

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 22 May 2025

Emma Roddick

I found your written evidence interesting, because you suggest holding a full election in a region to replace a recalled regional member. My reflection on that was that it was a case of looking at the first-past-the-post element and trying to transpose it on to the regional element.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 22 May 2025

Emma Roddick

Yes. That was my point about proportionality. Even if a recalled regional member fails the yes/no vote, their party—if there is still a representative left on the list—retains the seat through proportionality.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 22 May 2025

Emma Roddick

However, we are looking to create parity between the two systems, and the constituency elections decide who wins seats on the list to the same degree as the regional elections do. Therefore, should we be looking to retain proportionality across the board?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 22 May 2025

Emma Roddick

I suppose that people are not used to having a role in that process as it stands. If there was a yes/no vote, it might not be appreciated that they would not be saying no to that party.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 22 May 2025

Emma Roddick

An idea that has been raised with the committee is the potential for the initial signing of a recall petition being a yes/no question, which could perhaps be a single-stage process for a regional member. You could then prove not only that the 10 per cent threshold had been reached but that a majority of those who voted wanted that person to be voted out. In that case, you might not have to go back to the electorate.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 22 May 2025

Emma Roddick

That is interesting. My next question, which is for Annabel Mullin, is about the idea of having a regional election to replace somebody who has been removed following a recall. When parties implement equalities mechanisms for their candidates, it is most often done through the regional list. Do you have concerns that getting rid of that part would result in a less representative Parliament?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Dog Theft (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Emma Roddick

I can hear you. I am not sure whether you can hear me.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Dog Theft (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Emma Roddick

Yes, I can hear you fine.

Maurice, you suggest that the creation of a stand-alone offence would result in

“improved data and ... an improved evidence base.â€

We have had evidence from Police Scotland and the Crown Office arguing that the offence would either make no difference to data collection or that it could make it more difficult. Have you considered other ways to improve data collection besides legislation? What is your response to the evidence that we have had?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Dog Theft (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Emma Roddick

That is great.

What are your views on the possibility of expanding the use of aggravators to include the theft of other working dogs? That point was raised in a few of our evidence sessions.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]

Housing (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Emma Roddick

Yes, absolutely. Graham Simpson has guessed what my next comments will be. Overall, work needs to be done. I am happy to have those conversations with the cabinet secretary alongside Graham Simpson and other members. I agree that we should be working together. It seems that there is rare and strong consensus on the issue.

Mark Griffin, too, was right. I have the casework that he describes. Apart from the fact that the cause is often nothing to do with what the tenant is up to, there is no explaining to tenants who cannot afford to pay their heating bills that the landlord expects them to keep their windows open more of the time.

The issues that were raised by Ariane Burgess’s and Daniel Johnson’s amendments also deserve attention. Tenants should have a right to withhold rent in cases in which serious repairs are not being seen to, and landlords do not have a justification for raising their rent while that is the state of the property.