The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 756 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Emma Roddick
I want to go back to the processes that are in place at the moment. In the course of the committee鈥檚 evidence sessions, many suggestions have been made about how to handle the situation. There is the idea of a regional by-election, which we have discussed. Other witnesses have said that if recall triggers are met by a regional MSP, they should automatically be disqualified and replaced by the next person on the list. What are your thoughts on those proposals? Are you likely to consider changes to that process for stage 2?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Emma Roddick
Currently, for regional members there is a two-step process in which people would first have to sign a recall petition and then there would be a yes or no ballot on whether to remove the member. A suggestion has been made to put those steps together into a one-step process, which would mean that electors would have the opportunity to say yes or no from the beginning. There have been suggestions that that might improve secrecy around the recall petition. If you go to sign a recall petition, everybody knows that you are going to try to remove that MSP. There is no option to turn up and support them. What are your thoughts on that proposal?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Emma Roddick
If you want to measure the strength of feeling and test what constituents want, surely we need a yes or no process. It could be that 20 per cent of constituents sign the recall petition but 40 per cent of constituents are against it.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Emma Roddick
I think that people will conflate the two because, whichever way you go about it, comparisons will be made. One suggestion that was made to the committee was that a full regional by-election be held. It was pointed out to us that if somebody is upset with the conduct of an individual MSP, they might also want to hold the relevant party to account鈥攁lthough that is not the primary objective of your bill, of course. Although people have that opportunity in a constituency by-election, they do not have it on the regional side, where the party directly replaces the individual concerned. Do you have concerns about that disparity?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Emma Roddick
You are talking about fairness and saying that if we do something on the constituency side it should happen on the regional side. Currently, the bill provides for a by-election on the constituency side in which the recalled member can stand but not one on the regional side. If you had a one-step process on both sides, they would be closer to each other than the current proposal.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Emma Roddick
Can you see that there is a difference? The parliamentary calendar works for those who want to attend or observe Christian holidays, but it does not work in the same way for other religions.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Emma Roddick
Okay.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Emma Roddick
Why not?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Emma Roddick
I want to pick up on that. As you said, the requirement to attend at least once in 180 days is not particularly onerous. My concern is that, because the requirement is not a high bar for somebody who is physically and mentally able and does not have caring responsibilities, it is likely that the only people you would catch with the provision would be those with good reasons for not attending, and they would then have to share those good reasons with colleagues who were in political opposition to them. Do you agree that that is a possibility?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Emma Roddick
Okay. I will pass over to Sue Webber.