The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5744 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Ariane Burgess
I will sweep up and pick up a question that was skipped over earlier. Do the policies that are set out in the draft NPF4 make provision for meaningful public engagement in the plan-making and development management processes? If not, what changes would you like to be made?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Ariane Burgess
Those were useful responses. We will need to do an evidence session on derelict high streets so that we can dig down into the issue. There are some good examples.
We have a few more minutes before we end. Perhaps we are done but, if there are any other points that any of the witnesses wants to raise about NPF4 that have not been highlighted in the questions that we have asked, please put an R in the chat function.
Caroline Brown has put an R in the chat. Please tell us some more.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Ariane Burgess
Robbie Calvert, do you want to come back in on climate?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Ariane Burgess
We have a lot of work cut out for us.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Ariane Burgess
Thank you for that perspective.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Ariane Burgess
Cliff, do you have anything to add on that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Ariane Burgess
I know all about the Applecross plan. It is fantastic.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Ariane Burgess
I really appreciate that. That kind of detail that you are giving us—on the use of the word “unacceptable” in policy 19, for example—is very helpful for us, because we need to understand what you need to know and what people in the sector need to have spelled out so that we are all moving together on this in a good way.
I will bring in my colleague Miles Briggs, who has a number of questions for the panel.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Ariane Burgess
Thank you. That concludes our questions. I think that we have done a good job in covering a lot of ground. The witnesses have made good and important comments in response to our questions. It has been a helpful session. Thank you all for giving up your time and joining us today.
I will suspend briefly to allow for a changeover of witnesses.
11:02 Meeting suspended.Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2022
Ariane Burgess
This has been a brilliant and illuminating discussion that has given me clarity on some points about which I have been mystified. I have a few questions. I will ask them of you all.
Should the Government require public bodies to procure a minimum percentage of their food from suppliers that are based in Scotland, and a minimum percentage of their food from organic farms?
I will do a preamble to my next question. The response from Scottish Land & Estates to the committee’s consultation notes that
“consumers will need an understanding of what constitutes ‘good food’”.
We have touched on that already. It also states:
“This will require clear labelling and a greater understanding of the provenance of Scottish produce.”
I ask the witnesses for their views on the importance and practicalities of enhanced food labelling, which could include the product’s carbon footprint, the method of production for livestock products, whether the food is ultraprocessed and, potentially, other categories.
I am sorry that I am rattling through my questions. I hope that the witnesses get the gist of them. I can jog their memories.
My final question refers to the Scottish Food Coalition’s consultation response, which stresses the importance of aligning
“Government business and trade policy … with the Good Food Nation goals”,
so that business incentives never encourage movement away from the goals. Do Robin Gourlay and Geoff Ogle agree with that recommendation? Do any of the witnesses have suggestions for how that could be achieved in practice?
I ask Mary Brennan to start by picking up on those three questions. They are about procuring from Scotland, food labelling and business incentives that encourage the good food nation goals.