The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5835 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2023
Ariane Burgess
Good morning. I will follow on from Alasdair Allan鈥檚 question. The charity Blue Cross says that a separate code of practice for those about to buy a dog, rather than on ownership itself, would complement the existing code of practice, as that would cover two different areas of dog ownership鈥攏amely, acquiring a dog and owning a dog. Is the Scottish Government supportive of producing guidance on responsibly acquiring, buying and selling a dog?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2023
Ariane Burgess
Thanks for that.
You mentioned the Kennel Club. Our papers refer to its surveys in 2021, 2022 and 2023, which make it clear how bad the situation is and how things have just stayed the same. In that respect, I would be interested in hearing your response to a couple of things. First, given the continuing problems with puppies, why have ministers not brought forward a code through the powers under the Animal Health and Welfare (Scotland) Act 2006?
My second question is about amendments. I understand the general practice of trying not to put things into legislation, because of the need for flexibility or consultation, but I would imagine that Christine Grahame has already consulted on the elements that need to be in the bill. If the bill is not going to cover the kind of specifics that she is asking for, why not? What makes this issue so special? I guess that the question is connected to the one that I asked initially: why have ministers not brought forward something already?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2023
Ariane Burgess
I want to come back to your remark about the prescriptive nature of the code. The provisions that Christine Grahame has included in sections 2 to 4 all seem to be fairly generic. I cannot imagine that there would be a problem with the proposed questions, because those are questions that any prospective owner would want to ask themselves, although we might want to change the provisions in section 4, on the certificate. It seems to me that what is laid out in sections 2 to 4 would be required, but section 5 provides that ministers may revise the code from time to time, as long as it continues to give effect to sections 2 to 4. Christine Grahame wants to ensure that the provisions of sections 2 to 4 will have a lasting life. Those provisions seem fairly generic in that they include fundamental things that we would want a code to include.
You said that the code of practice provisions are a bit prescriptive, but you also pointed to the six-month period for the code of practice to come into effect and the desire to go out to consultation again. I would be interested in hearing whether you would be open to the six-month period being amended and what sort of period you think would be appropriate.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2023
Ariane Burgess
So, it is a language issue.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2023
Ariane Burgess
I heard your concerns about the registration scheme. We have heard from stakeholders that a system of regulation to cover all litters is welcome, but that it would have to sit alongside a user-friendly, easily accessible, centralised and transparent register of anyone breeding and selling dogs in order to be easily enforced. I heard your concerns about names and addresses, but what came up at our previous evidence session related to the centralised nature of the scheme and that it would be good to be able to cross-reference on a national basis.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Ariane Burgess
Okay. Thanks for that.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Ariane Burgess
Does anyone else want to say something?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Ariane Burgess
I will move on but stay in the same area. Stacey Dingwall and Ben Edgar-Spier started to touch on this. One of the reasons why the bill has been introduced relates to the impact that mass tourism has on our communities. I am interested in hearing from any of you about the alternatives. Ben Edgar-Spier mentioned redirecting high taxation. If we do not go down this route, how can we tackle the issues that communities face when there is mass impact on tourism infrastructure in order to improve things for those communities? What are the other ways of doing that, aside from what has been mentioned on redirecting high taxation?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Ariane Burgess
Stacey wants to come in.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Ariane Burgess
That concludes our questions. We appreciate your coming in. It has been good to hear more nuanced approaches to your sectors and how they will be affected, so thank you for that. Next week, we will be hearing from local authorities.
We agreed at the start of the public meeting to take items 3 and 4 in private, so, as that was the last public item of our agenda for today, I close the public part of the meeting.
11:52 Meeting continued in private until 12:25.