The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5737 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Ariane Burgess
I will now speak to amendment 553 and other amendments in the group.
Across Scotland, numerous communities and groups, which have place making at their heart, wish to create good-quality community housing. Such projects not only take pressure off taxpayers but can also deliver happier, healthier communities. Too often, the challenge for those groups is getting land. Amendment 553 is intended to make it easier for them to turn the vision of creating a home into reality. Existing legislation requires local authorities to keep registers of those who wish to self-build, but the current register and its associated guidance do not provide enough support to self-build projects. Amendment 553 would change that by reforming the register and its associated processes.
First, it will be open only to local community groups or individuals who plan to live in the house that they build. I have been careful to ensure that commercial developers will not be able to use it as a loophole. Secondly, councils will have to refer to the register whenever they make decisions about planning, housing or land disposal. That requirement will create only a small time and resource burden and will mean that the land supply is matched up with demand. Thirdly, to make the process as simple as possible for councils, I have provided that interested parties are required to ensure that their register entries are up to date. That way, councils do not have to constantly chase up interested parties or rely on what could be an out-of-date register.
Another feature that I have included is a requirement for councils to make a best-value assessment of selling land for self-build, which will allow community housing to scale up more easily, because a project that can prove that it will deliver benefits for the community鈥攆or example, by saving the taxpayer money鈥攚ill be able to access land at a discounted rate. The wording that I have used ensures that the option will not be open to individuals who have to pay market rates. That is very much a first step towards replicating some of the abilities that English and European local authorities have in order to put power into local people鈥檚 hands, so that they can create homes in their area that meet their needs.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Ariane Burgess
I hear what the cabinet secretary is saying about the provisions in the 2019 act. However, I have drawn on provisions in the Self-build and Custom Housebuilding Act 2015. I am looking for more support for self-build and custom-build. I am just wondering whether something needs to be looked at in existing legislation. This is all similar to some of the conversations that we have been having during the work on the bill about putting more support into it so that communities can come forward and get land. It is another approach to finding ways of bringing forward the housing that we urgently need.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Ariane Burgess
The result of the division is: For 3, Against 4, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 223 disagreed to.
Amendments 459 and 460 not moved.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Ariane Burgess
There will be a division.
For
Burgess, Ariane (Highlands and Islands) (Green)
Against
Coffey, Willie (Kilmarnock and Irvine Valley) (SNP)
Gallacher, Meghan (Central Scotland) (Con)
Griffin, Mark (Central Scotland) (Lab)
MacGregor, Fulton (Coatbridge and Chryston) (SNP)
Stevenson, Collette (East Kilbride) (SNP)
Stewart, Alexander (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Con)
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Ariane Burgess
The result of the division is: For 1, Against 6, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 461 disagreed to.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Ariane Burgess
The next group is on non-domestic rates. Amendment 568, in the name of Rachael Hamilton, is the only amendment in the group.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Ariane Burgess
We need to move on, because of time.
I invite Willie Rennie to wind up and to indicate whether he wishes to press amendment 1 or to withdraw it.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Ariane Burgess
The result of the division is: For 4, Against 3, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 191 agreed to.
Amendment 192 not moved.
Amendment 462 moved鈥擺Maggie Chapman].
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Ariane Burgess
The result of the division is: For 4, Against 3, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 568 agreed to.
Amendment 270 moved鈥擺Mark Griffin].
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Ariane Burgess
The question is, that amendment 270 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.