The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 685 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Gillian Mackay
Thank you鈥攖hat was useful.
I will return to the idea of advocacy, which is mentioned in the bill. In your opinion, should the part about complaints be changed in order to better integrate advocacy, or should the sections of the bill that deal with advocacy be changed to better reflect expectations about how people will be helped to navigate the process? We have heard from a lot of people that the provision of information is an important part of the advocacy role and that it gives people the tools that they need to navigate what is, as you have shown, a complicated system.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Gillian Mackay
Absolutely鈥攖he culture aspect with regard to complaints is important. I suppose that there is only so much that the bill can do to get us to where we want to be on that. Other colleagues might want to cover that point.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Gillian Mackay
Yes鈥攖hat would be really helpful.
I will go a wee bit further into that. The charter of rights and responsibilities is in the bill, but鈥攁s you rightly said鈥攚e need to ensure that it has some real effect. Which bodies should have responsibilities within that? Should that be made explicit in the bill in order to help people to see where the responsibilities flow and to whom they should speak? Should we demystify the structures for the people who access social care?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Gillian Mackay
We have heard from some people that, if social care was operating at the level that we would wish for鈥攊f there was no delayed discharge and nobody was waiting for assessment鈥攑rovision of advocacy and information might not be needed. Will you outline why the right to advocacy and information is so integral to ensuring that people鈥檚 right to social care support can be realised?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Gillian Mackay
That is great鈥攖hank you.
11:30Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Gillian Mackay
It answers my question to a certain extent. What I am looking for is similar to what John Mason was asking about earlier with regard to how we drive cultural change. Some of that is structural鈥攚ho is on the board and so on鈥攂ut it is also about the approach to engaging with learners and teachers.
I accept that there is provision for a learner interest committee, but that will be quite small compared with the spread of learners across Scotland. How can the board and other bodies within qualifications Scotland be made more accessible and welcoming to learners and teachers to ensure that on-going feedback can be taken forward?
09:45Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Gillian Mackay
Thanks, convener鈥攖he confusion that comes with two Gillians.
This question is for Fiona Robertson. The current SQA board comprises 11 members, none of whom, as far as I am aware, is a registered teacher, and none of whom has any experience of undertaking a current SQA qualification. I welcome the bill鈥檚 provisions to add teachers and learners to the board, although I think that they should be expanded to ensure that the board has a majority of registered teachers. How should the new board enact those provisions to ensure that the new body, qualifications Scotland, is more engaged with those groups than the SQA?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Gillian Mackay
I have a very quick question. A lot of reform is going on, and the bill is only one part of it. Arguably, most of the reform that the Government wants to take forward is outwith the legislative space. Are we doing things in the right order, with legislation being introduced and then non-legislative reform work being done, or would you have liked to have seen something different?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Gillian Mackay
A huge amount of reform work is being done, and the bill is only part of that. It could be argued that most of the reform that the Government is considering sits outside legislation. Do you believe that we are undertaking the reform work in the right order? Should we start with the bill and then move on to other non-legislative reform work, or would you have preferred us to take a different approach?
I will come to Anne Keenan first, because she has touched on all the other reform work that is under way.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Gillian Mackay
I will come back to you, Graham, on the point about those jigsaw pieces. What are the dangers of potentially having to take a hammer to those jigsaw pieces to make them fit in that context of reform, rather than the whole-scale review to make sure that everything sits together neatly, as the Hayward approach might have achieved?