成人快手

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 28 December 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2972 contributions

|

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

STV

Meeting date: 9 October 2025

Stephen Kerr

I understand that their aspirations will be for their shareholdings to retain their value, if not for that value to increase. However, they have just seen their holdings depreciate by 50 per cent in a year. Surely, they are saying much more than that to your executive team. Are they expressing confidence in you?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

STV

Meeting date: 9 October 2025

Stephen Kerr

Where does the figure of 拢3 million come from? What is the basis for it?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

STV

Meeting date: 9 October 2025

Stephen Kerr

But nothing quite like what will happen with STV North. You are effectively surrendering that licence, are you not?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

STV

Meeting date: 9 October 2025

Stephen Kerr

There are no management jobs involved.

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

STV

Meeting date: 9 October 2025

Stephen Kerr

Right. So there is no rational basis for the 拢3 million and 60 jobs鈥攖here is no detail behind that. They are going round the departments basically identifying people who are not managers who will possibly lose their jobs?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

STV

Meeting date: 9 October 2025

Stephen Kerr

The STV Group seems to be more ambitious for STV Studios in the next few years than it is for the broadcaster. Is that a fair comment?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

Transparency of Intergovernmental Activity

Meeting date: 2 October 2025

Stephen Kerr

Yes, I accept the fact that there have been formal meetings, but, when we visited London recently, we heard evidence from a UK Government minister about how good the relationship was now after the reset between the UK and Scottish Governments. He told us that he was out with a UK minister鈥擨 do not know whether I am allowed to say their names. Am I?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

Transparency of Intergovernmental Activity

Meeting date: 2 October 2025

Stephen Kerr

Sometimes you have to force people together. It suits some politicians not to speak to each other and to just shout at each other through the broadcast and other media. Does the idea that there will be a meeting and that, therefore, preparatory work needs to be done, and then post-meeting communiqu茅s and so on must be produced, mean that, even when people do not like each other鈥攚hen the chemistry is not good and the culture is not right鈥攖hey still have to meet and speak?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

Transparency of Intergovernmental Activity

Meeting date: 2 October 2025

Stephen Kerr

I have two more questions, convener, and then other colleagues will want to come in. Then, if there is time, I will have 100 more questions, at least.

My first question is about the idea of having joint scrutiny, which Keith Brown alluded to. I am a strong believer in the idea that we should co-operate across Parliaments, because we have so many areas of joint interest. Where else in the world does joint scrutiny happen? Where else in the world would members of a House of Commons select committee, a Scottish Parliament committee, a Senedd committee and perhaps a Stormont committee come together to do a joint inquiry? Does that happen? How successful is it? How does it work?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

Transparency of Intergovernmental Activity

Meeting date: 2 October 2025

Stephen Kerr

Does anyone else have any experience or knowledge of these things?

We have discussed it as a committee, and we have met with members of committees of the House of Commons and the House of Lords because the scope for co-ordinated inquiries鈥攍et us call them that, if not joint inquiries鈥攊s great. One challenge that we have had here has been getting UK ministers to come and speak to committees with the regularity that we would like. Joint approaches might work better, because, constitutionally, ministers are responsible only to the Parliament that they sit in鈥擨 understand that. It would be helpful if there was a broader approach.

My second question is to do with the EU-UK reset, which could be another mythical creature for all I know. I am wondering about the consequences of agreements, particularly for the food and drink aspects of any reset. I do not know how near we are to having some agreement with the European Union, but undoubtedly one of the demands of the European Union will be that we operate in lockstep with its regulations. Setting aside the issue of whether we should be in lockstep at all, I am interested in the consequences for this Parliament of that arrangement, because, based on the reports that we get of the volume of regulation that would come our way, we would struggle to do anything other than just nod at its coming and going. There would be no scrutiny whatsoever.

Can I have some commentary from those of you who have a view on it about the consequences of a lockstep regulatory agreement between the UK and the European Union for scrutiny, accountability and democracy?