The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 810 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Okay. Will the bill make that a bit clearer, or will it not alter the process at all?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Kaukab Stewart
It might be helpful to tell us about that, because that multi-agency work is complex and requires time. The teacher is at the heart of that, because they see the pupil regularly, whether that be for a single subject or for the whole day. How effective is that process at the moment? Is there scope to improve it through the bill? Other witnesses will definitely want to come in on that point.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Kaukab Stewart
You have highlighted that every young person has an individual journey. The reason why I asked about and explored the bill’s scope is that the number of young people who come under the definition will have a direct impact on resourcing, and that will have financial implications.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Thank you.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Kaukab Stewart
I think so.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2023
Kaukab Stewart
You indicated that most young people will be easily identifiable. However, do you think that the bill sufficiently recognises people who have mild to moderate mental health conditions or people who are going through mental health crises? We have also alluded to people who have fluctuating support systems, and I am mindful that not everything is visible in that sense.
Based on the definition of disability in the Equality Act 2010, who should determine eligibility in the first instance? If there are disputes, which will inevitably happen, how would they be resolved?
Rebecca, I will go to you first. Feel free to comment on the previous topic. I am also happy for you to respond to my most recent question.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Thanks, Rebecca.
I will ask a final question, which relates to the scope of the bill. The financial memorandum to the bill suggests that around 4,000 school leavers a year would meet the current definition of “disabled”, which is around 8 per cent of school leavers from state schools. Is that a reasonable estimate?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2023
Kaukab Stewart
I suppose that I am looking to find out whether that is a reasonable number. Do you think that there will be a lot more people? Do you agree with that estimate?
Andy Miller, do you have anything to add? Feel free to shake your head.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2023
Kaukab Stewart
You have had a good stab at it. Let us go to Andy Miller.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2023
Kaukab Stewart
I have listened with great interest to the perspectives of the witnesses. They have been very informative.
I will ask questions about whom the bill should cover and how young people should be identified. The bill bases whom it should cover on age and the definition of disability as stated in the Equality Act 2010. Do you think that that is proper? Will that cover everybody? Will that allow all young people to be identified, considering that not all of them will be in a system already? People can have a variety of needs, and some might not be in a system, if you know what I mean. There are challenges around that. I am interested in hearing how local authorities can identify children and young people who would be eligible without anybody falling through the net. I will start with Jenny Miller.