The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 810 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Thanks very much.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2023
Kaukab Stewart
I will come back to that point—I had international comparators.
I will stick with education. Rob, you mentioned the word “survive”. I am passionate about education, and everyone should thrive through education. However, we know about the impact of poverty. Resources can be put into front-line education—a child has a place, a classroom, a teacher in front of them, their books and so on. However, we know that children might be living in unsafe housing, in precarious personal circumstances and all of that—I am alluding to the poverty-related attainment gap. What is your opinion of the minimum core in education? Should resources be targeted at housing and health? We know that these things are all interconnected and I am not expecting a black-and-white answer, but it would be good to hear your opinion.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Is the example of free school meals a good one? A child could be sitting in a classroom with the best teacher in the world and everything in front of them, but if they are hungry, have not had their breakfast and are not going to eat, their priority will be their hunger. That will prevent them from thriving in education and learning, so the investment and the money need to go into feeding and housing children, for instance, or maternal healthcare. It is a complex picture. With the right to education, the sand goes into all sorts of different areas.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2023
Kaukab Stewart
I do not mind if Zainab wants to come in.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2023
Kaukab Stewart
That is a fair point, but that is not what I meant. I was just using it as an illustrative example. I would like families to have access to good, nutritious food.
I realise that time might be a little tight, deputy convener, but if I can just—
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Good morning, everyone. I am usually on the Education, Children and Young People Committee, but I have come over to this committee today. I would like drill down into how the minimum core obligations apply in education. We accept that everyone has the right to education—that they have a place. In Scotland, the curriculum is based loosely on Bloom’s taxonomy, but sitting beside that is Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Where do the minimum core obligations fit in with that? We can think of them as a pyramid that is sitting on sand. Are the core obligations the sand underneath that hierarchy of needs, or are they part of it? That is my opening gambit. Luis, you look as though you are itching to get in with a response.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Thank you very much. You said that decision makers had to act. I think that you have already responded to my colleague Pam with some of the actions that the Scottish Government could take. I want to widen that out a little bit and ask about the areas that you are prioritising and how they fit with the Scottish Government’s priorities. Do you think that that is a good fit, or are there areas that the Scottish Government should look at that would align with your priorities? Ramiza first, please, if that is possible.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2023
Kaukab Stewart
I do not.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Kaukab Stewart
For absolute transparency, I should say that I am a member of the NASUWT. Mike Corbett is probably expecting more difficult questions, and I will try to be as non-biased as possible.
I will move on to whom the bill should cover. The bill defines a child as someone under the age of 18, but the age range goes up to 26, so that huge band covers school-age children and those older than that. We all know that, daily, teachers in schools face a wide variety of pupils and needs. Do teachers in mainstream schools routinely consider whether a pupil has a disability, as opposed to additional support needs, and how to meet those needs? There is a difference, as we know. I ask Mike Corbett to answer first.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Kaukab Stewart
That is a good example of the transition issue.
Do the witnesses agree that everyone who meets the Equality Act 2010 definition of a disability should automatically have a transition plan, or should there be an element of self-identification and an opt-out process? In previous answers, it was said that young people, for whatever reason, might not want to declare that they are disabled. The equality guidance states that,
“In the vast majority of cases”,
it will be evident that there is a disability. That will not always be the case, however, so there is a bit of wiggle room, is there not? It would be good to hear your opinions on that.