The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 692 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2023
Màiri McAllan
There is no doubt that there is a substantial number of individual examples of the 2015 act having a positive impact, and not just through what the act has allowed local authorities to do and local communities to benefit from. We need to accept that there is a signalling effect by a Government creating primary legislation that makes those obligations, rights and responsibilities clear.
However, some years down the line, we cannot be blind to the fact that there are some ways in which things do not appear to have worked as we had expected. Waiting lists are long and growing; as you have identified, the availability of land remains a problem; and I know that the committee sees that the disparity of experience remains a problem. On the latter point, that could be so, but, equally, I am mindful of the need to recognise the different experiences in local authorities across the country. We all come from different parts of the country, and we will see different need. We need to remember that local authorities are dealing with different situations.
Your first point was about data gathering. The act does not place duties on the Scottish Government to collect or benchmark data. I am open to the idea that that could be explored. You suggested that the annual allotment reports might be a suitable place from which to do that, and I will consider whether that is doable and what the benefits would be to local authorities and the Scottish Government.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2023
Màiri McAllan
Thank you. I will take that on board.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2023
Màiri McAllan
It is part of the block grant so, again, an assessment is made of the responsibilities of local authorities and the extent to which they may have increased in any given year owing to legislation. The block grant is the final figure from which we would expect it to come. I do not need to tell the committee about this year’s block grant; I am sure that you are looking closely at it.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Màiri McAllan
As I said, the late stage of the stage 3 amendments—
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Màiri McAllan
It is the reality, convener—
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Màiri McAllan
Convener, you have previously stopped me from talking when I have tried to answer the question that has been posed, so I will not address the first part of Mr Ewing’s question again, but I can say that I am always open to considering the impact of legislation.
Secondly, the decision to protect the mountain hare is based on evidence of a risk to their conservation status. I can hear Mr Ewing asking himself what impact falconry has on that conservation status and would respond to that by saying that lawmakers must make decisions that are consistent across the piece. This is a question for us all: why would it be justifiable to make an exception to species protection for sporting purposes if we were to have a different treatment for those who need to control a species on a grouse moor or a similar place? I must respond to threats to conservation status during a nature emergency but I must also be mindful to take decisions that are consistent across the piece for all those who seek to hunt in the countryside.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Màiri McAllan
I think that it would be a highly unusual activity for any law officer in Scotland to issue guidance saying that a criminal offence was not going to be prosecuted.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Màiri McAllan
It is about the protection of the mountain hare, not the licensing scheme itself. The licensing scheme is an example of how, despite the ban, falconers who operate with golden eagles still have the opportunity to take mountain hares.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Màiri McAllan
If Stan Whitaker is telling us that that is the case, it is the case. Let us be realistic: that reflects—
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Màiri McAllan
I will add to that by reiterating Hugh’s earlier comments about the best way to manage the situation is about understanding the density of the protected species and operating in areas where you are least likely to encounter them.