³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 16 December 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1177 contributions

|

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 11 November 2025

Elena Whitham

I am wondering about the potential for there to be a lot of missing context should the second medical practitioner not have access to the original notes. Would that be a concern when it comes to fullness of information?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 11 November 2025

Elena Whitham

Will the member give way?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 11 November 2025

Elena Whitham

Will the member take an intervention?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Wellbeing and Sustainable Development (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 6 November 2025

Elena Whitham

I want to spend a wee bit of time discussing the definitions of sustainable development and wellbeing. We have already touched on that this morning, and thinking about the issue logically, we probably could have raised it earlier in the questioning process.

The RTPI and UKELA expressed concerns about the definition of sustainable development in their written evidence. I wonder whether Jenny Munro and Ellie Twist could expand on those concerns a little bit more.

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Wellbeing and Sustainable Development (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 6 November 2025

Elena Whitham

Do you think that the definition of sustainable development as set out in the bill could stand alone in the absence of a definition of wellbeing in the bill?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Wellbeing and Sustainable Development (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 6 November 2025

Elena Whitham

Does anybody else have any comments on that point?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Wellbeing and Sustainable Development (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 6 November 2025

Elena Whitham

The Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland’s view is that it does not support a statutory definition of wellbeing as set out in the bill. You explained clearly, Emma, that you believe that we will deliver on wellbeing if we incorporate all the human rights and have a human rights-based approach. Could you expand on that point for us?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Wellbeing and Sustainable Development (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 6 November 2025

Elena Whitham

From a UKELA perspective, what are the concerns around the definition of sustainable development?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Wellbeing and Sustainable Development (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 6 November 2025

Elena Whitham

That is helpful, because planetary boundaries, the link to environmental limits and the need to include them in the definitions also came up in last week’s evidence session.

Sustainable development is raised in relation to many different aspects of legislation and outcomes that we are seeking to achieve, but no real definition is agreed. How can we ensure that we collectively understand what sustainable development means? Would the bill be a vehicle to firm up a definition?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 4 November 2025

Elena Whitham

From the outset, my position is that I support Liam McArthur’s amendment 24, because it will allow us to put in place some more safeguards around the definition of terminal illness. In countries where such a definition is applied, we see, as Patrick Harvie just set out, that those who seek an assisted death do so at the later stages of a terminal illness.

I turn to amendment 143, which Mr Balfour has said is more of a probing amendment. If we use three months as the timeline, such a short prognosis will put people who are terminally ill in the difficult position of making a hurried decision, instead of being able to take time to consider all their circumstances.

On Daniel Johnson’s amendment on a six-month prognosis, I would defer to the committee’s stage 1 report, which set out our understanding of why a prognostic timeframe can be particularly difficult. I understand members’ desire to explore the issue but, at this stage, I would not be supportive of that. That is not to say that I will not change my position as we go forward, but clinicians who make decisions that affect access to benefits sometimes feel under undue pressure to make an assessment of a prognostic timeframe. That can also lead to a situation in which, although there is no clear prognosis, people are given a time limit that might not be realistic. We are starting to funnel people down a path.