The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2161 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2023
Jim Fairlie
I think that I am correct in saying that Scotland gets about 17 per cent of the agriculture budget. Do you have any indication of whether that level of funding will continue to come to Scotland at that percentage rate, or is there a need for that to increase, too?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2023
Jim Fairlie
Okay. Thank you.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2023
Jim Fairlie
My apologies, convener. My understanding is that tier 1 and tier 2 might well get the vast majority of the funding, but additional conditionality will be added to that, which will pave the way for tiers 3 and 4 to be able to do their work. If I am wrong—
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2023
Jim Fairlie
How much does it need to be to get to net zero?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2023
Jim Fairlie
You are absolutely right in everything that you say.
Pete Ritchie, I know that you have done extensive work on the matter. How do we make those higher costs that are part of producing the kind of food that we want to produce affordable for the people who want to buy it?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2023
Jim Fairlie
You talked about the issue of long-term investment in relation to companies locating in Scotland. Do you agree that that will require a critical mass to ensure that long-term production stays in place?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2023
Jim Fairlie
I have a minor point. We have been talking about how we define the terms in the bill. I was looking recently at the Hill Farming Act 1946 in order to discover things about muirburn. The 1946 act prescribed that only specific types of tups could be used, as defined by the minister. How many ministers know what a good hill tup looks like and what its function should be? There is a danger that if we are very prescriptive, we will send farming in a particular direction. We surely have to look at something that allows ministers to let the industry develop the objectives in the bill.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2023
Jim Fairlie
You said that food security is a public good. My understanding has always been that food production and food security have never been regarded as a public good on the basis of public support.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2023
Jim Fairlie
Something has just popped into my head—it may be absolute nonsense, so please feel free to shoot it down.
I go back to the point that David Thomson made about farmers having to meet particular requirements in order to supply whoever. We have QMS, Tesco and Marks and Spencer, all with different schemes that are asking for different things. If we want to make things as simple as possible for farmers, who are already fully stretched to the limit of their resilience with regard to being able to continue what they are doing, is there an opportunity in the bill for us to put in place one single scheme, which everybody accepts is the standard?
I am talking purely from the farmer’s point of view. Farmers may say, “Oh my god—here’s another layer of something that we have to deal with.” How do we take that burden off them and allow CPD to be something that they want to buy into?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2023
Jim Fairlie
On the basis of trying to get a market advantage.