The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2665 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Jim Fairlie
Before we came here, we had a fairly extensive meeting to talk about a lot of those issues. One of the things that came out of that meeting was that we wanted to ask the committee what it thought. We do not have the exclusive rights to knowledge and information, and I am more than happy to hear ideas from the committee. If the committee thinks that that suggestion has great value, let us have a look at it. We could do an audit if it would be of value.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Jim Fairlie
I do not know whether we are doing enough, but we are certainly doing plenty. Is the work going fast enough? I cannot give you a direct answer to that right now—Terry Shevlin might know more than I do. We are alive to the fact that we must ensure that island connectivity is at the forefront of our thinking. Loganair, which was at the round table that I hosted in the summer with Ms Hyslop, is clearly the biggest player in that area. The work with ZeroAvia, which Terry mentioned, is on-going. An awful lot of work is going on; whether it is going fast enough remains to be seen.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Jim Fairlie
We have talked about that. I will turn to Terry Shevlin.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Jim Fairlie
I missed the first part of what you said about lifeline services.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Jim Fairlie
I see—gotcha. Terry Shevlin has had more conversations about the timeline with UK Government officials than we have. My understanding is that we are no further forward and it is still being looked at.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Jim Fairlie
As I have said, it will be for airlines to work out how they will continue to provide air travel.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Jim Fairlie
Let me answer so that Terry Shevlin does not have to. Terry speaks as a Government official, but when it comes to adding value as a Government minister, I can say that I will be pushing as hard as I possibly can to ensure that Scottish interests are very high on the agenda in anything that goes forward from here.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Jim Fairlie
There are already issues with us not being given information in time. How do we know what the detail will be when we are looking at something that could be 10 years down the line? It is important that we protect the right of this Parliament to be able to have a say on things that will touch on devolution.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Jim Fairlie
I am optimistic that we will get a satisfactory conclusion. I will leave it at that.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Jim Fairlie
The UK Government accepts that the clauses touch on devolution but, at the same time, it says, “We do not really need to bother you with it.” Clause 1 is about revenue certainty contracts that will be set over a 10-year period. We have no idea what will happen between now and then—the vast majority of us will not be sitting in this Parliament in 10 years’ time. It is only right that, for devolved areas, this Parliament has the right to say, “Okay, what does that actually mean?” We have no idea what changes there will be or what the outcomes will be of the various discussions that are going on within the UK and globally as to how SAF will develop.
The UK Government’s position is that, “The bill is about a technical thing and we do not need to worry you about it.” Why would we not just consent if the issue were that small? The only reason why a Scottish minister or the Scottish Parliament would refuse consent would be if there were a concern. If the UK Government says to us, “These are minor technical issues and you don’t need to worry about them,” we will agree—if they are minor technical issues.
Convener, I remember you raising the issue about members not getting the time to scrutinise things properly—I believe that you raised that in the chamber last week.