The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2665 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Jim Fairlie
We will have figures, but, as I said, I do not have them to hand. We can write to the committee with those figures. This is as much an evidence session for the Government as it is for everybody else. Is the committee’s position that there should be a ban on allowing dogs to travel south of the border? I am more than happy to hear what the committee’s positions are on such things.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Jim Fairlie
I have made it clear that I am not entirely convinced that the quality of life of a kennel dog is any less than that of a dog that lives in a home.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Jim Fairlie
No. It is the fact that racing is being banned on oval tracks.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Jim Fairlie
It was not my bill to bring forward in 2024 to say that it was on oval track racing. Let me be absolutely clear, convener, because I see where you are trying to go with this. The position of Mr Ruskell’s proposed bill at that point was to ban racing—end of. There was no mention of oval tracks—you are absolutely correct that there was no mention of oval tracks. Mr Ruskell has now changed the bill so that it will ban racing on oval tracks. We can support that, based on the evidence that we have about the inherent risk of animal welfare issues from oval tracks. That is the only thing that has changed.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Jim Fairlie
But that is not what the bill was asking us to do.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Jim Fairlie
We were not minded to ban racing in Scotland.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Jim Fairlie
Your position, convener, is that the number of injuries has gone down. It has gone down very marginally, and there has certainly not been any reduction in the number of deaths, based on the GBGB information. That is the GBGB information—
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Jim Fairlie
It may have gone down marginally, but it is about proportionality, and the oval track is the bit that is causing the issue for the welfare—
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Jim Fairlie
No. The only thing that has allowed the Government to come to the position that it has come to is the fact that Mr Ruskell has changed the bill from banning racing in its entirety to banning it on oval tracks.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Jim Fairlie
Because the bill, at that time, was talking about banning the racing of greyhounds—