The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2161 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Jim Fairlie
Clearly, this is the first one that we have done, so we do not have evidence. As I said, a scheme could still be legally challenged, but this is a safeguard to ensure that everything has been scrutinised to the fullest extent and therefore that any cause for a legal challenge would be lessened. It means that everything that is required to be done in order to provide the services that we are looking to be supplied has been scrutinised at every level.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Jim Fairlie
Strathclyde Partnership for Transport.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Jim Fairlie
We are in the process of working towards getting stuff done now. We are a long way down the road. I was not in the Parliament when the act was passed, so I do not know why it has taken us so long to get to this point from 2019, but we are where we are and work is being done right now. Conversations are being had about allowing the memorandums of understanding to be established so that we know what the guidance looks like.
If the regulations are passed, we will proceed at pace to get the work done as quickly as we can. I ask Sharon Wood or Bridget Bryden to speak about the timescale for progress. If we get the regulations through today, what will be the timescale for the next stage? Where would we go from here?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Jim Fairlie
I would need to consider that.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Jim Fairlie
I could turn that round and ask, “If it is not the traffic commissioner, then who?” Who would be the decision maker? Do you want the decision to come back to ministers? That would bring the matter back into the political sphere. It was decided in 2019 that it would be taken out of the politicians’ hands, and that is where we are.
I am sorry, but what was the second part of your question, Monica? I did not write it down. I apologise.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Jim Fairlie
A consultation is on-going at the moment with—
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Jim Fairlie
Sorry—my apologies. Let me correct the record. They will be consulting shortly on whether they are going to go for the franchising model.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Jim Fairlie
Absolutely—we want to get it right. However, I go back to a point that I made previously. If we stop and we do not proceed with the measures that are before us, we will potentially go back to square 1.
On the evidence that you heard from Mr Bray and the proposals that were rejected, there had been a recommendation, as opposed to a final decision. We could turn that round the other way: if a transport authority knows that the final decision could be taken out of its hands, then—going back to the point that I made to Mr Lumsden—it will make damn sure that it gets it right in the first place. It will therefore do all the work and the due diligence that it needs to do to ensure that, when it presents its proposal to the panel, it has done absolutely everything within its power.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Jim Fairlie
No. The panel will be required to make its decision within a six-month period, although it will be up to whoever is presenting the franchising proposal to ensure that they have done all the work that they need to do for it to be progressed.
We are taking a belt-and-braces approach. Anyone who cuts corners will get stopped, so why start in the first place? It is a matter of having certainty that someone else is taking another look—and they might say, “You didn’t do that bit.” Those who are making a proposal should therefore do it right in the first place.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Jim Fairlie
The approach that was taken there was based on the financial model alone; it did not take the whole picture into account. That is the fundamental difference. The proposal there was rejected on the basis of a financial model.
Clearly, the financial model is a really important aspect. We want to ensure that the business case has been made to the fullest extent, and it will include everything else. We are not comparing apples with apples here; we are comparing two different things.