The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2665 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Jim Fairlie
As I said, Environmental Standards Scotland is an independent body that is currently setting out its strategy for 2026 to 2031. That is the current position.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Jim Fairlie
By finding the solutions to those issues, we hope and think that we will alleviate most of the legal concerns that have been expressed, and we will make the necessary amendments to the bill as we go forward.
However, there are also policy concerns. We know that some stakeholders and crofters would prefer that the share always remained with the inby croft and could never be separated. The concern is that that might lead to many more common grazings not being used at all, at least for extended periods of time. Historically, it would not have been an issue, because most crofters kept livestock, but that is no longer the case. If 80 per cent of current crofters had livestock, we would not be having this conversation. In fact, if 50 per cent of crofters had livestock, we probably would not be having this conversation either, but we estimate that the figure is around 25 per cent, and it has been decreasing over the years. It is therefore not hard to imagine a township where all the crofters are meeting their inby crofter duties but none of them are using the common grazings.
In that context, I do not think that there is a justification for insisting that all the shares remain attached to the crofts in all circumstances. The decision should remain a matter of choice for the crofter. Many crofters will retain a share in a grazing, but others will have no interest in the share whatsoever because they use their inby land purely to grow food and not to run livestock at all, or they might have no intention of using it.
We have listened to the concerns and we think that the process requires a safeguard, so we are also looking to establish an agreed approach whereby a crofter, tenant or owner-occupier would have to apply to the commission to divide a grazing share from the croft, and they would have to state a reasonable purpose for doing so. We should trust the commission to regulate that and ensure that the right balance is struck between the shares being in the hands of those who will actually use them and protecting against too many shares being separated from crofts.
When discussing deemed crofts, we often start with the assumption that they are a bad idea, but the more important question is whether the shares are in the hands of people who are actually going to use them. In its evidence session, the commission correctly pointed out that a deemed croft can create an opportunity for a new entrant and their family by way of an apportionment. Officials are looking at whether we can amend the legislation to allow those who have an apportioned deemed croft to have all the rights that would allow them to work it as a croft, including being able to decroft a small area of land for a house. The purpose is to create the functioning community that we talked about at the start of the session.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Jim Fairlie
I invite Michael Nugent to pick that up.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Jim Fairlie
You have already touched on the scenario of accidental separation. Some crofters do not use their grazings shares and have absolutely no intention of using them. However, somebody else might want to use those grazings shares, and they can be put to better use. That is the purpose behind the measure.
Is there anything that I am missing here, Michael?
10:00Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Jim Fairlie
We can take that away and look at it. Are you talking about the wider community rather than the crofting community?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Jim Fairlie
The commission has significant powers, but I am quite happy to ask Bill Barron or Michael Nugent to say whether those need to be strengthened.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Jim Fairlie
The policy plan will include everything that is to do with crofting, so I presume that that will also have to be considered as part of the common grazings.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Jim Fairlie
Do you mean the common grazings committees?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Jim Fairlie
You are saying that the crofters have the right to the land and the neighbouring community wants to know what the crofters are doing.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Jim Fairlie
The Crofting Commission already has the power to enforce that duty.