The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2161 contributions
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2021
Jim Fairlie
I will direct my questions specifically to two witnesses. My first question is for Eman Hani. You said that you need grass-roots organisations to deliver the message into communities. We have sat in this committee before and been told that that is already happening. Are you telling us that it is not?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2021
Jim Fairlie
Thank you. We can put that to the Government. Mohammed, you gave a similar message. You said that some of the older people in the Islamic faith certainly believe that, if it is God’s will, it will happen—that caught my attention. Please forgive my ignorance of your faith, because I really do not know enough about it, but is there not also a message in Islam about looking after one other, which getting the vaccine would help with?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2021
Jim Fairlie
I am sticking with Mohammed. I recently attended a Sikh women’s organisation briefing session in which they talked about a very gendered society. I did not understand what they meant by that until they explained it. You spoke about how the head of a large family could end up influencing the entire family. How do we get to those individuals in order to be able to get the vaccine into more arms?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2021
Jim Fairlie
We should ask about capacity in order to know what volume will be stored. In addition, will there be a market trigger for when the meat can be released back into the food chain?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2021
Jim Fairlie
On carbon trading, I see real barriers in the way. If a farmer is net zero, he does not have anything to sell: he is net zero. If he has a surplus, he can trade it. We need to be very careful about this.
I am sorry, convener; I am hogging the microphone.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2021
Jim Fairlie
·ˇľ±±ôľ±»ĺłó—
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2021
Jim Fairlie
I am aware of the time, convener, so I will leave my questions there.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2021
Jim Fairlie
Dieter, you are a fantastic witness. I have been engrossed in everything that you have said, but, if I was still farming, I would be thinking, “Oh my God, I hope he doesn’t develop the policy or we’re not going to get a penny.” I might be completely misrepresenting what you say.
I would like to raise a couple of points with you. Another thing that I have got out of the conversation is that we can talk in silos and it sounds great until we start to bring in the unintended consequences. You have given us so much to think about. I have thoroughly enjoyed your evidence.
Correct me if I am wrong, but food costs us in subsidy from the public purse, in land degradation and environmental damage or in the consumer paying for it from their purse when they buy it in the shops. The current subsidy system was introduced after the second world war. About 30 per cent of household income used to go on food, but now it is about 8.5 per cent. Therefore, it could be argued that the public value of the subsidy is the fact that food is cheap. However, the counter to that is that we can buy much cheaper food from Australia or America, for instance, and the question is whether the price of the subsidy out of the consumers’ pockets will still be met by bringing in cheap food from elsewhere. That is a short statement but it is a huge question. How do we square that?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2021
Jim Fairlie
My question is about Eilidh Mactaggart’s role in relation to what is going to be funded.
Dieter Helm talked about the possibility of investments in land in Scotland being handled by a trust fund that would have environmental concerns and sequestration as prerequisites for the initiatives that received funding. Do you see the Scottish National Investment Bank as the vehicle for that, so that any private funds that come into land in Scotland come through you and are then distributed via that one-stop shop in order to achieve the environmental aims, rather than there being what he described as a wild west free-for-all?
11:00Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2021
Jim Fairlie
We have got the big ideas, the big visions and all the rest of it, but there is concern that market-based mechanisms such as carbon credits are fuelling the attractiveness of purchasing land for carbon offsetting. That potentially brings risks to local communities and other land users. On 30 September, the Scottish Parliament held a members’ business debate on community wealth and the emergence of green lairds, in which the impact of carbon markets on land and land ownership was discussed.
My question is for Eilidh Mactaggart and then for Pat Snowdon. How can we avoid greenwashing by major companies coming into Scotland and buying up natural capital without any great benefit to the people who live here?