The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2161 contributions
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
According to the evidence that we were given this morning, noise is a problem for fish that are laying eggs. If the fish do not lay the eggs, you do not get the young fish. It is a dual problem, as far as I can see.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
Okay, we will need to take some scientific evidence to make sure that we know what we are talking about here. I cannot get away from the fact that, if you get the eggs laid and the young fish hatch, they will be predated upon and we will get bycatch. I understand all that. However, if the cod move because of noise, all of that will not necessarily happen. If a bird lays an egg in a nest and gets disturbed, she leaves the eggs and the eggs do not hatch. Either way, you get the same level of loss, and I would like to get more evidence on what the reality of that is.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 24 February 2022
Jim Fairlie
The point that I am trying to get to is this: how do we surveil to ensure that, if a virus is moving about in our community, we catch it as early as possible? We know that the current system is sufficient. Will what we are moving to be sufficient?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 24 February 2022
Jim Fairlie
I reiterate what Mr Whittle has just said: the message that came across clearly this morning was that you cannot follow a patient regardless of where they are—the information does not follow them from one department to another. My understanding was that it could go right across the country but, from what we heard this morning, that is not the case.
There are so many things that I would like to talk to you about.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 24 February 2022
Jim Fairlie
Thank you very much; that is very helpful.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 24 February 2022
Jim Fairlie
Thanks very much to witnesses for coming along to speak to us today.
I will come back to the issue of staff morale in a minute or two, but I will start by telling you what my thinking is. This is an inquiry into excess deaths. What do you feel the value of the inquiry is to your profession?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 24 February 2022
Jim Fairlie
I go back to Dr Shackles—I will come back to Professor Elder in a moment.
Do you believe that the purpose and value of the committee’s inquiry is that it can shine a light on the deficiencies that already existed?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 24 February 2022
Jim Fairlie
Sorry—I want to come in on that. Surely it would not be viable for us to have that level of staffing at all times in order to cope with a potential peak.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 24 February 2022
Jim Fairlie
I know. Given where we are in the pandemic, what is the World Health Organization’s advice on testing?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 24 February 2022
Jim Fairlie
I will be very brief, convener. My question is for Dr Shackles. We all stood outside our doors and clapped for the NHS and for nurses, but there seems to have been a massive turnaround. You guys have now become the whipping boys, with GP surgeries experiencing appalling abuse. I guess that some of that will be because GPs’ practices are changing and that you are now seeing people online as opposed to in person. Where is the GP system at the moment? Will it go back to being in-person appointments only? How do we make it easier and better for GPs as an individual profession within a wider profession? I very much take on board your comments about the tracing of patients’ information, and we should look at that, as well as making sure that the IT system works for you guys. What else do you need to turn the situation around so that you no longer receive the utterly appalling abuse that you have been getting?