˿

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 15 August 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2161 contributions

|

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Ministerial Statement

Meeting date: 31 March 2022

Jim Fairlie

Mr Swinney, I hope that you will get a wee rest on this question, because I am targeting it to Jason Leitch.

We spoke before about a constituent of mine who is very concerned about getting the vaccine. She is going through various medical issues because of cancer. She had an adverse reaction to a flu jag, and she is very concerned about getting any form of vaccine that has to do with coronavirus. There are still venues that require a vaccine passport, which she will obviously not be able to get. She has put to me that there is a panel of four people who decide what the exemptions should be, but she will not be allowed to give her own voice on the issue that she has. Is she correct that there is a panel of four people who make that decision? What are the criteria for not getting the vaccine? Can anything be done to allow her to have her voice heard so that she can put her point across?

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Ministerial Statement

Meeting date: 31 March 2022

Jim Fairlie

My final point is one that has been raised again and again with me by the same constituent. Apparently, somewhere in the media or on television, Professor Linda Bauld made the statement that, if you have an adverse reaction to the flu jab, you should not get the Covid jab. I do not know whether that is verified, but it is a position that keeps being put to me. Is it correct?

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Ministerial Statement

Meeting date: 31 March 2022

Jim Fairlie

That is grand. Thank you very much.

Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 30 March 2022

Jim Fairlie

So, Mr Eustice will be appearing in front of this committee on 18 May.

Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 30 March 2022

Jim Fairlie

On a point of order, deputy convener. In the exchange between the convener and me on 12 January, the convener said:

“We wrote to George Eustice and got a response. Unfortunately, he was unable to attend on the date that we asked, but I am confident that we will have him in front of us at some time in the near future.”—[Official Report, Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee, 12 January 2022; c 31.]

Can you or the clerks advise whether the committee was subsequently able to reach Mr Eustice to ask him to give evidence? Is there any explanation of why the committee has been unable to hear from Mr Eustice, and is there any update on when we can expect to do so?

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Coronavirus (Recovery and Reform) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 24 March 2022

Jim Fairlie

An awful lot of discretion is given to local authorities in the bill. Is there a concern that they have too much discretion and that people who make applications for licences will not have a say in how the meeting will be held? Perhaps Mairi Millar would be the best person to answer that.

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Coronavirus (Recovery and Reform) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 24 March 2022

Jim Fairlie

I will go back to some points that John Mason raised and will direct my question to Fiona Blair. It concerns the guarantee of in-person registration. The Scottish Government’s position is that the effect of sections 18 and 20 is that a local registration office must offer in-person registration to any individual who desires it. Is that your reading of the bill?

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Coronavirus (Recovery and Reform) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 24 March 2022

Jim Fairlie

As more people take up the digital option, will there be problems further down the line with smaller and smaller numbers of people who want to have an in-person meeting being able to be accommodated?

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Coronavirus (Recovery and Reform) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 24 March 2022

Jim Fairlie

There is nothing in the bill that says that the local authority must provide the in-person option. Do you think that that should be added to the bill?

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Coronavirus (Recovery and Reform) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 24 March 2022

Jim Fairlie

I will press you a wee bit on that. You say that the local authority should still have discretion. That is regardless of whether someone lives in a remote area—I live in a remote area myself. I may be dissatisfied, for instance, with the decision that a local authority has taken on how a meeting or application is going to be conducted, as there is nothing more frustrating than not being able to speak to someone face to face. If the local authority has the final say on that discretion, where does that leave the person who feels dissatisfied with the fact that they cannot have a sit-down, face-to-face conversation? Surely there should be some provision in the bill that allows people to say, “Sorry, but I’m not happy with that. I want to sit down with somebody.” Is that not something that you would consider?