The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2161 contributions
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 31 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
Mr Swinney, I hope that you will get a wee rest on this question, because I am targeting it to Jason Leitch.
We spoke before about a constituent of mine who is very concerned about getting the vaccine. She is going through various medical issues because of cancer. She had an adverse reaction to a flu jag, and she is very concerned about getting any form of vaccine that has to do with coronavirus. There are still venues that require a vaccine passport, which she will obviously not be able to get. She has put to me that there is a panel of four people who decide what the exemptions should be, but she will not be allowed to give her own voice on the issue that she has. Is she correct that there is a panel of four people who make that decision? What are the criteria for not getting the vaccine? Can anything be done to allow her to have her voice heard so that she can put her point across?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 31 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
My final point is one that has been raised again and again with me by the same constituent. Apparently, somewhere in the media or on television, Professor Linda Bauld made the statement that, if you have an adverse reaction to the flu jab, you should not get the Covid jab. I do not know whether that is verified, but it is a position that keeps being put to me. Is it correct?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 31 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
That is grand. Thank you very much.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 30 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
So, Mr Eustice will be appearing in front of this committee on 18 May.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 30 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
On a point of order, deputy convener. In the exchange between the convener and me on 12 January, the convener said:
“We wrote to George Eustice and got a response. Unfortunately, he was unable to attend on the date that we asked, but I am confident that we will have him in front of us at some time in the near future.”—[Official Report, Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee, 12 January 2022; c 31.]
Can you or the clerks advise whether the committee was subsequently able to reach Mr Eustice to ask him to give evidence? Is there any explanation of why the committee has been unable to hear from Mr Eustice, and is there any update on when we can expect to do so?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 24 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
An awful lot of discretion is given to local authorities in the bill. Is there a concern that they have too much discretion and that people who make applications for licences will not have a say in how the meeting will be held? Perhaps Mairi Millar would be the best person to answer that.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 24 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
I will go back to some points that John Mason raised and will direct my question to Fiona Blair. It concerns the guarantee of in-person registration. The Scottish Government’s position is that the effect of sections 18 and 20 is that a local registration office must offer in-person registration to any individual who desires it. Is that your reading of the bill?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 24 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
As more people take up the digital option, will there be problems further down the line with smaller and smaller numbers of people who want to have an in-person meeting being able to be accommodated?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 24 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
There is nothing in the bill that says that the local authority must provide the in-person option. Do you think that that should be added to the bill?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 24 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
I will press you a wee bit on that. You say that the local authority should still have discretion. That is regardless of whether someone lives in a remote area—I live in a remote area myself. I may be dissatisfied, for instance, with the decision that a local authority has taken on how a meeting or application is going to be conducted, as there is nothing more frustrating than not being able to speak to someone face to face. If the local authority has the final say on that discretion, where does that leave the person who feels dissatisfied with the fact that they cannot have a sit-down, face-to-face conversation? Surely there should be some provision in the bill that allows people to say, “Sorry, but I’m not happy with that. I want to sit down with somebody.” Is that not something that you would consider?