łÉČËżěĘÖ

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 24 August 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2161 contributions

|

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Petition

Meeting date: 8 February 2023

Jim Fairlie

I agree that we should close the petition at this stage. The evidence that Bally Philp gave us was tremendous and very detailed, but we have heard only from that petitioner. There will be other people in the fishing community who will want to give as much evidence as he has given. We need to be mindful of the fact that the Government is doing its review, so I think that we should close the petition now and include the issues in the broader picture that we look at later in the parliamentary session.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Petition

Meeting date: 8 February 2023

Jim Fairlie

Welcome to the committee, Bally.

I know very little about fishing. The sum total of my fishing knowledge comes from a day out on a hand-dived scallop boat. I therefore come to this from a different perspective. It would seem, anecdotally, that a 3-mile limit worked because there were more fish in the past. What is the science behind the basis of the 3-mile limit? If a 3-mile limit were set up, what is the science that tells us the level that we are trying to return the fish stocks to?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Petition

Meeting date: 8 February 2023

Jim Fairlie

I appreciate that this is a difficult question session for you, Bally. Has there been scientific research into the matter, or is your evidence anecdotal? Is your position that we should close the area off for 10 years to see what happens? What would happen during that period? You have already talked about what happens to the communities that are reliant on fish at the moment. In those 10 years—or whatever period—of closure, you want the fish stocks to increase. What level would the fish stocks recover to? Would you start fishing all over again after that? You would already have displaced other fishing boats out of the system.

I am trying to consider the matter from the point of view of fairness. How do you ensure that what your petition is calling for is fair for everyone in the system?

Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee

Shark Fins Bill

Meeting date: 25 January 2023

Jim Fairlie

The point that I want to make is that we are banning the import of whole shark fins, but we would still be encouraging the trade if we allowed processed shark fins to come into the country as a product to be consumed.

Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee

Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Bill

Meeting date: 25 January 2023

Jim Fairlie

I apologise. The papers were not clear.

Has there been any intergovernmental discussion about the regulation of new genetic techniques in the future, including the extent to which the common frameworks process has already been used?

Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee

Shark Fins Bill

Meeting date: 25 January 2023

Jim Fairlie

One point that I want to get on record, which we can see in our briefing paper, is the sheer scale of the issue—97 million sharks are killed for 16,000 to 17,000 tonnes of fins, which is horrendous.

The cabinet secretary mentioned shark fin soup in tins. Do we import tins of shark fin soup, and where do they come from?

Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee

Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Bill

Meeting date: 25 January 2023

Jim Fairlie

I will follow on from what the minister has just said. The convener asked whether there is anywhere where you see the powers being used, but I am looking at the letter that the UK Government sent to you. It says:

“We have been clear that we do not presently intend to amend the GM regulatory regime in Scotland to remove categories of products which are currently regulated as GMOs. The views of stakeholders in Scotland will be central to decision-making in this devolved area of responsibility”.

That concerns me greatly. Does the UK Government intend to go beyond the Scottish Government to speak to stakeholders first, before it comes to the Scottish Government? Also, the word “presently” concerns me. It indicates to me that what the UK Government is actually saying is that it may, at some point, decide to go beyond the Scottish Government’s devolved powers so that it can make decisions at Westminster. Is that your interpretation of that letter?

Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee

Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Bill

Meeting date: 25 January 2023

Jim Fairlie

I will leave it there.

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Monitoring Covid-19 Recovery

Meeting date: 19 January 2023

Jim Fairlie

There is a feeling that we could have planned ahead better, which leads me on to a further source of confusion—there is a lot of that in this evidence session, I have to tell you.

We have an excellent performance framework, but a link to the budget is missing. Other countries link the two. What other countries do it the way that Scotland does it? Why is it done in that way, rather than by linking the budget to the performance framework?

I am sorry—I am not asking you to look at the issue from Scotland’s point of view. I am asking about what happens in other countries that you deal with; I know that you have not had a direct link to Scotland.

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Monitoring Covid-19 Recovery

Meeting date: 19 January 2023

Jim Fairlie

You have actually led me very neatly on to my next question by talking about what data is included. Brian Whittle stated that we had a bigger cost during Covid because of our particular health challenges. Is that correct? Has Scotland had to pay more during Covid because of our particular health challenges? Has it cost us more, financially, than other countries because of Scotland’s health challenges?