The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2161 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Jim Fairlie
I have a supplementary question for Vicki Swales. It seems to me that that is where some of the tension is coming from. Farmers want to produce food and to do that sustainably, but other parts of the ARIOB are concerned about biodiversity and climate change. Where do you sit?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Jim Fairlie
[Inaudible.]
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Jim Fairlie
Thank you, convener—you took me by surprise there.
There are key areas of uncertainty around future policy. Tim, you touched on the subject of data, and there is an issue around where the research gaps are. Martin, you seemed to be disagreeing with Vicki Swales when she was talking about the LFA side of things. What are the differences there as regards what the ARIOB should be doing? What areas of research is the ARIOB using to help to develop the policy?
I will start with you, Martin, as I have cited your comments on LFA. I will come to you after that, Vicki.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Jim Fairlie
I will make one comment. It is not a question; it is a comment. What concerned me about the evidence that we got last week from the CCC was the use of the word “probably” in relation to reducing the amount of greenhouse gas that is being sequestered.
I have a question for Martin Kennedy. We are talking about uncertainty in future policy. You have said in the past that 97 per cent of the funding comes from the UK Government. If that stops in 2024 or if there is no certainty about it, where do you see us going?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Jim Fairlie
How does that feed into ensuring that there is a critical mass of numbers?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Jim Fairlie
I will come back to you, Vicki, but I will ask the whole panel a question. Given the explanation that Martin Kennedy has just given, and given that there is a wide range of stakeholders on the ARIOB, is there general consensus on where you are and how you will go forward?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Jim Fairlie
Are those differences on policy detail causing part of the delay?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Jim Fairlie
I will come to you, Vicki, I promise, but I just want to explore this point for a wee second.
If the LFA support is altered in a way that does not support producing calves, those calves are then sold down the country. That, in itself, helps the quality of the soil further down the country. Are you saying that it is not just about keeping people where they are, and that the support builds into the whole thing of how we maintain the carbon in all soils, not just in the hill soil?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Jim Fairlie
So, we are looking at a critical mass plus—
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Jim Fairlie
Yes, but if there are not enough cattle on the ground in the first place, that system falls down. I graze cattle on the hills, so I fully understand your position, but how does not having enough numbers on the ground support the critical mass as well as high nature value farming?