The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3887 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting) [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Good morning. My question touches on points that were raised earlier, particularly by Helen Douglas and Alison Weir. It is all very well for things to be in place, but are they working properly? Perhaps this is an opportunity for us to look under the bonnet a wee bit, to see what needs to change.
James Allan, your report made three recommendations under the justice and law reform theme. One said that
“All services should be able to refer to each otherâ€
and that funding should be provided to support that. I am interested in hearing about any evidence that that is not currently taking place. What are the barriers and obstacles to that happening properly?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting) [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you for that comprehensive response, cabinet secretary. You mentioned the national drugs mission funds, and I note that the five-year commitment is very welcome. The funds are administered by the Corra Foundation and they offer multiyear funding to third sector and grass-roots organisations. Can you say more about the plans for the future of that very welcome and important five-year funding provision?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting) [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Following up on that point, you will be aware that the Scottish Government has accepted your recommendation in principle. It has advised the committee, and the panel, that it will explore the matter further, to better understand the barriers relating to the courts service and the police. We look forward to hearing a wee bit more about that. Thank you for making that recommendation.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting) [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Of course.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting) [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
The people’s panel recommended that
“All services should be able to refer to each otherâ€
and that funding should be in place to allow that to happen. You said that you listened to the evidence from the previous panel, where there was discussion about the services in local areas not necessarily being connected in the way that they need to be. We welcome the Government’s response to that recommendation, which states:
“We will explore this further to better understand the specific barriers the court service and police have in referring to third sector organisations.â€
Can you provide the committee with a wee bit more detail on what that will involve?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting) [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
That is super. Thank you. We might be able to come back to that if there is time later in the session.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you.
Cabinet secretary, before we get under way, I wonder whether I could take the liberty of beginning with a question that I hope you will not mind my asking. I appreciate that it might not sit entirely within the scope of the bill. You might recall that, last year, the Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee led a debate on a petition calling for the creation of a specific offence that would enable courts to hand down longer sentences when miscarriage has been caused by an act of domestic violence. In your contribution, you said that you believed that there should be a statutory aggravator for causing miscarriage through such violence. Given the consensual nature of that debate, and the points covered in it, will you now consider introducing such an aggravator? Are you willing to meet me to discuss its possible introduction at stage 2 of the bill process?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you. I note the provisions in the bill that say that a case review panel could be instructed to carry out its review in conjunction with another form of review. That is reassuring.
I am conscious of time, so I will bring in Fulton MacGregor. We will then move on to part 1.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I will now move us on to part 1. I will go first to Liam Kerr—once he is ready—and I will then bring in Pauline McNeill.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
A couple of members still have questions, but I just want to ask about digital productions and the authentication of electronic copy documents. In relation to digital productions, some concerns have been expressed that the original physical item—the physical production—might be disposed of before the potential evidence benefits of retaining it have been fully explored. What work is being done on a retention and disposal policy? Given some of the evidence that we have heard, might there be scope to make the position clearer in the bill?