³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 19 December 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 3887 contributions

|

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting) [Draft]

Tackling Drug Deaths and Drug Harm

Meeting date: 20 February 2025

Audrey Nicoll

Good morning. My question touches on points that were raised earlier, particularly by Helen Douglas and Alison Weir. It is all very well for things to be in place, but are they working properly? Perhaps this is an opportunity for us to look under the bonnet a wee bit, to see what needs to change.

James Allan, your report made three recommendations under the justice and law reform theme. One said that

“All services should be able to refer to each otherâ€

and that funding should be provided to support that. I am interested in hearing about any evidence that that is not currently taking place. What are the barriers and obstacles to that happening properly?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting) [Draft]

Tackling Drug Deaths and Drug Harm

Meeting date: 20 February 2025

Audrey Nicoll

Thank you for that comprehensive response, cabinet secretary. You mentioned the national drugs mission funds, and I note that the five-year commitment is very welcome. The funds are administered by the Corra Foundation and they offer multiyear funding to third sector and grass-roots organisations. Can you say more about the plans for the future of that very welcome and important five-year funding provision?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting) [Draft]

Tackling Drug Deaths and Drug Harm

Meeting date: 20 February 2025

Audrey Nicoll

Following up on that point, you will be aware that the Scottish Government has accepted your recommendation in principle. It has advised the committee, and the panel, that it will explore the matter further, to better understand the barriers relating to the courts service and the police. We look forward to hearing a wee bit more about that. Thank you for making that recommendation.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting) [Draft]

Tackling Drug Deaths and Drug Harm

Meeting date: 20 February 2025

Audrey Nicoll

Of course.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting) [Draft]

Tackling Drug Deaths and Drug Harm

Meeting date: 20 February 2025

Audrey Nicoll

The people’s panel recommended that

“All services should be able to refer to each otherâ€

and that funding should be in place to allow that to happen. You said that you listened to the evidence from the previous panel, where there was discussion about the services in local areas not necessarily being connected in the way that they need to be. We welcome the Government’s response to that recommendation, which states:

“We will explore this further to better understand the specific barriers the court service and police have in referring to third sector organisations.â€

Can you provide the committee with a wee bit more detail on what that will involve?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting) [Draft]

Tackling Drug Deaths and Drug Harm

Meeting date: 20 February 2025

Audrey Nicoll

That is super. Thank you. We might be able to come back to that if there is time later in the session.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Criminal Justice Modernisation and Abusive Domestic Behaviour Reviews (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Audrey Nicoll

Thank you.

Cabinet secretary, before we get under way, I wonder whether I could take the liberty of beginning with a question that I hope you will not mind my asking. I appreciate that it might not sit entirely within the scope of the bill. You might recall that, last year, the Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee led a debate on a petition calling for the creation of a specific offence that would enable courts to hand down longer sentences when miscarriage has been caused by an act of domestic violence. In your contribution, you said that you believed that there should be a statutory aggravator for causing miscarriage through such violence. Given the consensual nature of that debate, and the points covered in it, will you now consider introducing such an aggravator? Are you willing to meet me to discuss its possible introduction at stage 2 of the bill process?

Criminal Justice Committee

Criminal Justice Modernisation and Abusive Domestic Behaviour Reviews (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Audrey Nicoll

Thank you. I note the provisions in the bill that say that a case review panel could be instructed to carry out its review in conjunction with another form of review. That is reassuring.

I am conscious of time, so I will bring in Fulton MacGregor. We will then move on to part 1.

Criminal Justice Committee

Criminal Justice Modernisation and Abusive Domestic Behaviour Reviews (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Audrey Nicoll

I will now move us on to part 1. I will go first to Liam Kerr—once he is ready—and I will then bring in Pauline McNeill.

Criminal Justice Committee

Criminal Justice Modernisation and Abusive Domestic Behaviour Reviews (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Audrey Nicoll

A couple of members still have questions, but I just want to ask about digital productions and the authentication of electronic copy documents. In relation to digital productions, some concerns have been expressed that the original physical item—the physical production—might be disposed of before the potential evidence benefits of retaining it have been fully explored. What work is being done on a retention and disposal policy? Given some of the evidence that we have heard, might there be scope to make the position clearer in the bill?