The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3500 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Audrey Nicoll
That is a helpful clarification. I had not quite picked that up.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Audrey Nicoll
It is more about the support side. If a member of a family—a mother, for example—is registered in the scheme, is there an opportunity for the support that comes from that registration to work for the family as well as for the victim?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Yes, that would be helpful.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Audrey Nicoll
That would be helpful, so that we can keep the focus on—
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Audrey Nicoll
I suppose what I mean is that there is often a family around the victim of domestic abuse: the victim is living within a family setting. In order to make a victim notification scheme trauma informed and effective, so that it does the job that we want it to do, has any consideration been given as to what provision could be made, if any, so that, in addition to victim support being offered, some support could also be offered to the wider family—for example to children living within the family setting?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Audrey Nicoll
I remind members that I am asking for questions to remain on stage 2 amendments; I know that it is very easy to drift into other areas. Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you for that.
I remind members—this may be of interest to our witnesses, too—that the Minister for Victims and Community Safety is coming to the committee to give an update on the progress on the review of the victim notification scheme. That will be helpful for members ahead of stage 2 of the bill.
I am conscious of the time, as we have a couple of other parts to cover. Part 2 relates to trauma-informed practice and part 3 is on special measures in civil cases. The Cabinet Secretary for Justice has provided one or two updates on those parts.
I will open up the questioning to members, if there is anything that they would like to raise around those two parts of the bill. I also ask our witnesses whether they would like to come back on anything in part 2 or part 3, in particular given that stage 2 is coming up. I will come to Sandy Brindley first, and then Kate Wallace.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you for those helpful insights. I will come back to Stuart Munro as I might have misheard you towards the end of your evidence. I want to clarify that, with regard to this particular issue, the cabinet secretary’s letter says:
“After careful consideration, I believe that the most prudent approach, best able to maintain balance and confidence in our system, is to seek support for a model with two verdicts, fifteen jurors, and a two thirds majority requirement for conviction.â€
I want to be clear about that. Perhaps I misheard what you said, Stuart.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Audrey Nicoll
We are a wee bit over time. Thank you both for joining us today and for providing a really helpful update on your views on the proposed stage 2 amendments.
We will have a short suspension to allow for a change of witnesses.
11:20 Meeting suspended.Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Our next group of witnesses are representatives of the legal profession. I am pleased to say that we are joined by Simon Brown, president of the Scottish Solicitors Bar Association; Michael Meehan KC, from the Faculty of Advocates; and Stuart Munro, convener of the criminal law committee of the Law Society of Scotland. I thank you all for joining us.
I intend to allow around 75 minutes for this session. We will begin with part 4 of the bill, just to confuse you, and I will open with a general question on jury reform. You will know that the Scottish Government is now seeking support for a model for jury reform that would have two verdicts of guilty or not guilty, removing the not proven verdict; 15 jurors; and a two-thirds majority requirement for conviction. What are your views on the revised proposal in comparison with what was in the bill at stage 1? I will start with Stuart Munro.